feat(chips): Add remove functionality/styling. #2476

topherfangio · 2016-12-30T18:27:30Z

Add events, styling and keyboard controls to allow removable chips.

Add basic styling for a user-provided remove icon.
Add keyboard controls for backspace/delete.
Add (remove) event which is emitted when the remove icon or
one of the delete keys is pressed.
Add md-chip-remove directive which can be applied to <md-icon>
(or others) to inform the chip of the remove request.

Add new directive mdChipInput for controlling:

(chipAdded) - Event fired when a chip should be added.
[separatorKeys] - The list of keycodes that will fire the
(chipAdded) event.
[addOnBlur] - Whether or not to fire the (chipAdded) event
when the input is blurred.

Additionally, fix some issues with dark theme and add styling/support
for usage inside the md-input-container and add styling for focused
chips.

BREAKING CHANGE - The selectable property of the md-chip-list has
now been moved to md-chip to maintain consistency with the new
removable option.

If you used the following code,

<md-chip-list [selectable]="selectable">
  <md-chip>My Chip</md-chip>
</md-chip-list>

you should switch it to

<md-chip-list>
  <md-chip [selectable]="selectable">My Chip</md-chip>
</md-chip-list>

References #120. Closes #3143.

Hat tip to @willshowell for suggestion to use secondary-text
for focus color :-)

devversion · 2016-12-30T18:38:56Z

src/demo-app/chips/chips-demo.ts

@@ -36,6 +38,9 @@ export class ChipsDemo {
    { name: 'Warn', color: 'warn' }
  ];

+  constructor() {
+  }


Is constructor unnecessary?

No; I think it got added by accident or something. I'll remove it.

devversion · 2016-12-30T18:39:56Z

src/demo-app/chips/chips-demo.ts

@@ -47,6 +52,16 @@ export class ChipsDemo {
    }
  }

+  remove(person: Person): void {
+    if (person) {


I think this check can be dropped, because TypeScript already validates the person is not undefined.

Also the indexOf would just return -1 if it's really undefined.

devversion · 2016-12-30T18:41:07Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.spec.ts

-        // Focus the middle item
-        midItem.focus();
+      it('focuses the first chip on focus', () => {
+        let FOCUS_EVENT: Event = {} as Event;


Looks like you are casting it twice.

devversion · 2016-12-30T18:42:03Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.spec.ts

+
+        it('BACKSPACE focuses the last chip', () => {
+          let nativeInput = chipListNativeElement.querySelector('input');
+          let BACKSPACE_EVENT: KeyboardEvent = new FakeKeyboardEvent(BACKSPACE, nativeInput) as any;


Same as above. The cast to any seems unnecessary here?

The first one is declaring the type; not casting it. When attempting to cast it to KeyboardEvent it requires me to override everything in KeyboardEvent so @jelbourn told me to just us any for now.

Hm, you should be able to do.

let backspaceEvent = new FakeKeyboardEvent(BACKSPACE, nativeInput) as KeyboardEvent;

as in this example

@devversion So, it looks like you are correct and this does indeed compile/run correctly, it's just that Webstorm is showing it as an error. I guess I need to play with my settings to figure out why.

topherfangio · 2017-01-04T18:32:54Z

Please hold off on reviewing this; I accidentally pushed some focus code into this branch that needs to be removed. Will update when done, but I'm working on some md1 issues at the moment.

jelbourn

I started reviewing this before I saw your last comment 😫 Some of the comments might be useful, though

jelbourn · 2017-01-13T01:11:52Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts

@@ -49,69 +49,125 @@ import {SPACE, LEFT_ARROW, RIGHT_ARROW} from '../core/keyboard/keycodes';
 })
 export class MdChipList implements AfterContentInit {

-  /** Track which chips we're listening to for focus/destruction. */
-  private _subscribed: WeakMap<MdChip, boolean> = new WeakMap();
+  /** Whether or not the chip list is currently focusable via keyboard interaction. */


This isn't a boolean, so Whether... isn't really the right way to phrase it. I think it's fine to say "tabIndex of the chip-list element."

jelbourn · 2017-01-13T01:13:18Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts

+  protected _tabIndex = -1;
+
+  /** When a chip is destroyed, we track the index so we can focus the appropriate next chip. */
+  protected _destroyedIndex: number = null;


Why store this instead of moving the focus immediately?

jelbourn · 2017-01-13T01:18:19Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts

+   */
+  protected _checkTabIndex(): void {
+    // If we have 0 chips, we should not allow keyboard focus
+    this._tabIndex = (this.chips.length == 0 ? -1 : 0);


Instead of manually calling _checkTabIndex and updating _tabIndex, why not just create a host binding like

host: { '[attr.tabindex]': 'chips.length ? 0 : -1' }

However, this should also be overridden by any user-provided tabIndex value, so that makes it a bit more complex.

jelbourn · 2017-01-13T01:23:26Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts

+   *
+   * TODO: Remove when md-input-container allows md-empty configuration.
+   * */
+  protected _hackLabelElement() {


cc @mmalerba

What is it that you need the input to do here? I'd rather avoid merging something like this.

jelbourn · 2017-01-13T01:28:25Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.spec.ts

+
+@Component({
+  template: `
+    <md-input-container>


cc @mmalerba - thoughts?

I'm not sure putting the chip-list inside of the input-container is the approach we ultimately want to take. Right now I don't think the input-container is in itself designed to have any content other than the input/textarea and friends.

I know we want to make the chips be part of the input's underline, but perhaps there's another way we could approach that.

I do want to support this sort of thing in the future (the mdInput directive would go on the md-chip-list though and md-chips-list would have to provide some input-like interface for mdInput to work with). For now though what about something like this:

<md-input-container> <md-chip-list md-prefix> <md-chip>Chip 1</md-chip> ... </md-chip-list> <input mdInput> </md-input-container>

jelbourn · 2017-01-13T01:32:57Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts


  /** The ListKeyManager which handles focus. */
  _keyManager: ListKeyManager;

  /** The chip components contained within this chip list. */
  chips: QueryList<MdChip>;

-  constructor(private _elementRef: ElementRef) { }
+  constructor(protected _renderer: Renderer, protected _elementRef: ElementRef,
+              @Optional() protected _mdInputContainer: MdInputContainer) {


So far we've been trying to avoid introducing any inter-component dependencies. In this case, I don't think we want to tightly couple the md-input with the chip-list, since people may use chips in combination with their own custom input (which is something Jen's team wants to do).

A less-coupled approach would be to create an interface like ChipInput, and accept that as an @Input (and making sure that either MdInput or MdInputContainer conforms to that interface. Then we could connect the two without introducing a dependency.

fxck · 2017-02-15T13:40:39Z

Is there any progress on chips? Now that autocomplete is more or less done, it'd be nice to start working on https://material.angularjs.org/latest/demo/chips

Is it assigned to someone? I already have my own version working, I could try and make a PR..

topherfangio · 2017-02-15T19:37:36Z

@fxck I am the developer assigned and am indeed working on the chips. I just took some time off to have a baby and am getting back to it :-)

I pushed some updates yesterday and should have more today. Hoping to have a mostly final version by this weekend, but it will need to go through the review process before being merged to master.

willshowell · 2017-02-22T16:44:59Z

src/lib/chips/_chips-theme.scss

  $unselected-foreground: if($is-dark-theme, mat-color($foreground, text), $light-foreground);

  $selected-background: if($is-dark-theme, mat-color($background, app-bar), #808080);
  $selected-foreground: if($is-dark-theme, mat-color($foreground, text), $light-selected-foreground);

+  $focus-color: mat-color($foreground, text);


What about using mat-color($foreground, secondary-text) instead? It would match the borders of the checkbox and radio components.

topherfangio · 2017-02-22T23:15:36Z

@kara @devversion Can you guys please review this updated PR at your convenience? It adds the mdChipRemove and the mdChipInput functionality along with some other small changes.

devversion · 2017-02-28T12:58:02Z

src/lib/chips/chips.scss

+
+// Fix the label offset
+.mat-input-container mat-chip-list ~ label.mat-empty {
+  transform: translateY(22px);


Where are the 22px coming from?

devversion · 2017-02-28T13:10:06Z

src/lib/chips/chips.scss

+.mat-input-container .mat-chip-list-wrapper input {
+  width: auto;
+  height: 38px;
+  margin-left: 8px;


Is there a way we can move those hard-coded values to variables?

And above for .mat-chip-remove, couldn't we calculate those left, right values?

devversion · 2017-02-28T13:13:26Z

src/lib/chips/chip.ts

@@ -145,6 +246,7 @@ export class MdChip implements Focusable, OnInit, OnDestroy {
    if (el.nodeName.toLowerCase() == 'mat-basic-chip' || el.hasAttribute('mat-basic-chip') ||
        el.nodeName.toLowerCase() == 'md-basic-chip' || el.hasAttribute('md-basic-chip')) {
      el.classList.add('mat-basic-chip');
+      this._renderer.setElementClass(this._elementRef.nativeElement, `md-chip`, true);


Is this correct? Do we really need to have the md-chip class on the host-element?

And also above with classList.add('mat-chip'), I think this is obsolete since we already set the class in the host metadata.

Good catch; this was leftover and I'm removing.

devversion · 2017-02-28T13:42:46Z

src/lib/chips/chip.ts

  /** Emitted when the chip is focused. */
  onFocus = new EventEmitter<MdChipEvent>();

+  /** Emitted when the removable property changes. */
+  onRemovableChange = new EventEmitter<boolean>();


We should not expose the EventEmitter.

class X { private _onRemovableChange = new EventEmitter<boolean>(); onRemovableChange = this._onRemovableChange.asObservable(); }

devversion · 2017-02-28T13:43:40Z

src/lib/chips/chip.spec.ts

+        });
+
+        it('DELETE does not emit the (remove) event', () => {
+          const DELETE_EVENT: KeyboardEvent = new FakeEvent(DELETE) as KeyboardEvent;


double cast shouldn't be necessary (also above).

TypeScript automatically interferes the types when doing const event = new FakeEvent(DELETE) as KeyboardEvent;

It's not really a double cast (it's just an explicit type declaration), but it is indeed extra code. I'll remove.

@willshowell

Add events, styling and keyboard controls to allow removable chips. - Add basic styling for a user-provided remove icon. - Add keyboard controls for backspace/delete. - Add `(remove)` event which is emitted when the remove icon or one of the delete keys is pressed. - Add `md-chip-remove` directive which can be applied to `<md-icon>` (or others) to inform the chip of the remove request. Add new directive `mdChipInput` for controlling: - `(chipAdded)` - Event fired when a chip should be added. - `[separatorKeys]` - The list of keycodes that will fire the `(chipAdded)` event. - `[addOnBlur]` - Whether or not to fire the `(chipAdded)` event when the input is blurred. Additionally, fix some issues with dark theme and add styling/support for usage inside the `md-input-container` and add styling for focused chips. BREAKING CHANGE - The `selectable` property of the `md-chip-list` has now been moved to `md-chip` to maintain consistency with the new `removable` option. If you used the following code, ```html <md-chip-list [selectable]="selectable"> <md-chip>My Chip</md-chip> </md-chip-list> ``` you should switch it to ```html <md-chip-list> <md-chip [selectable]="selectable">My Chip</md-chip> </md-chip-list> ``` References angular#120. Closes angular#3143. Hat tip to @willshowell for suggestion to use secondary-text for focus color :-)

JacobBrandt · 2017-03-10T03:31:13Z

Works great. Looking forward to this being merged.

willshowell · 2017-03-28T13:56:54Z

@topherfangio is this waiting for further review? Don't want it to get stuck in limbo!

topherfangio · 2017-03-28T16:07:32Z

@JacobBrandt Thanks for the kind words! I'm glad you like it!

@willshowell It is indeed waiting for a final review and I am nagging the appropriate people to get it done ;-)

jelbourn · 2017-04-10T23:32:31Z

src/demo-app/chips/chips-demo.html

        <md-chip color="warn" selected="true" *ngIf="visible"
-                 (destroy)="alert('chip destroyed')" (click)="toggleVisible()">
+                 (destroy)="alert('chip destroyed')" (remove)="toggleVisible()">
+          <md-icon md-chip-remove>cancel</md-icon>


Using the md-icon element directly here feels a little weird to me. Couple of thoughts:

I bet we can draw an x with css and avoid the need for the icon entirely.

md-icon has its own associated role and aria attributes, which may interfere with the chip's option-ness

I originally thought this should be a button element (since it's an action), but now I'm thinking that's probably not the case, since a screen-reader user will probably want to see the chip as an atomic option.

So, what do you think of changing this so that there's two directives:

<md-chip-remove>, which has its own x icon (potentially drawn with css)

[mdChipRemove] as an attribute that you apply when you want to do your own thing (no styles, only behavior)
?

jelbourn · 2017-04-10T23:33:42Z

src/lib/chips/_chips-theme.scss

@@ -16,34 +16,90 @@

  // The spec only provides guidance for light-themed chips. When inside of a dark theme, fall back
  // to standard background and foreground colors.
-  $unselected-background: if($is-dark-theme, mat-color($background, card), #e0e0e0);
+  $unselected-background: if($is-dark-theme, #656565, #e0e0e0);


Add a comment for the origin of #656565?

jelbourn · 2017-04-10T23:34:48Z

src/lib/chips/_chips-theme.scss

+
+      &:hover {
+        opacity: 0.54;
+      }


Any way to generally reduce the nesting in this file?

jelbourn · 2017-04-10T23:35:48Z

src/lib/chips/chip-remove.ts

+ * to properly center the icon within the chip.
+ */
+@Directive({
+  selector: '[md-chip-remove], [mat-chip-remove], [mdChipRemove], [matChipRemove]',


No need for the dash-case attribute selectors any more.

jelbourn · 2017-04-10T23:39:37Z

src/lib/chips/chip-remove.ts

+  /** Subscription for our onRemoveChange Observable */
+  _onRemoveChangeSubscription: Subscription;
+
+  constructor(protected _renderer: Renderer, protected _elementRef: ElementRef,


Can be updated to Renderer2 now

jelbourn · 2017-04-10T23:58:39Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts

-
-  set selectable(value: boolean) {
-    this._selectable = coerceBooleanProperty(value);
+  registerInput(inputElement: HTMLInputElement) {


Rather than being an HTMLInputElement, can we make this an interface that only defines the specific properties / methods the chip-list needs to interact with?

jelbourn · 2017-04-10T23:59:23Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts

+   * Programmatically focus the chip list. This in turn focuses the first non-disabled chip in this
+   * chip list, or the input if available and there are 0 chips.
+   *
+   * TODO: ARIA says this should focus the first `selected` chip if any are selected.


Can you move the TODO to a separate // comment so that it doesn't appear in the API docs?

jelbourn · 2017-04-11T00:18:27Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts

@@ -148,11 +175,19 @@ export class MdChipList implements AfterContentInit {
   *
   * @param chips The list of chips to be subscribed.
   */
-  protected _subscribeChips(chips: QueryList<MdChip>): void {
+  protected _subscribeChips(chips: QueryList < MdChip >): void {


You can omit the spaces inside the < >

jelbourn · 2017-04-11T00:20:50Z

src/lib/chips/chip-list.ts

+   * one.
+   */
+  protected _checkDestroyedFocus() {
+    let chipsArray = this.chips.toArray();


The toArray shouldn't be necessary; QueryList has a length property

jelbourn · 2017-04-11T00:22:47Z

src/lib/chips/chip.spec.ts

+          fixture.detectChanges();
+        });
+
+        it('SPACE selects/deselects the currently focused chip', () => {


Tests should start with the word should, e.g.,

it('should toggle selection with the space key', ...

axtho · 2017-04-21T06:58:30Z

Any progress on this?

sabithpocker · 2017-05-06T18:05:49Z

Are there any versions with chips and remove implemented. I reached here after looking around for a while!

DmitryEfimenko · 2017-06-01T05:28:49Z

May I ask if there is any progress on this?
Just trying to figure out if I should wait or look for something else for the feature I'm working on.

jelbourn · 2017-06-02T21:22:27Z

This PR is being absorbed into #4912

angular-automatic-lock-bot · 2019-09-06T13:02:31Z

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

_{This action has been performed automatically by a bot.}

topherfangio added the pr: needs review label Dec 30, 2016

googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Dec 30, 2016

devversion reviewed Dec 30, 2016

View reviewed changes

topherfangio force-pushed the team/topher/chips-remove-120 branch from 40ff7d9 to 95316e9 Compare January 1, 2017 01:42

topherfangio removed the pr: needs review label Jan 4, 2017

topherfangio force-pushed the team/topher/chips-remove-120 branch from 95316e9 to 47f528e Compare January 10, 2017 16:06

jelbourn added the pr: needs review label Jan 13, 2017

jelbourn reviewed Jan 13, 2017

View reviewed changes

jelbourn added in progress This issue is currently in progress and removed pr: needs review labels Jan 13, 2017

topherfangio force-pushed the team/topher/chips-remove-120 branch from 47f528e to 68aa7b5 Compare February 14, 2017 23:00

topherfangio force-pushed the team/topher/chips-remove-120 branch 2 times, most recently from 5794658 to f81b595 Compare February 17, 2017 22:46

willshowell reviewed Feb 22, 2017

View reviewed changes

topherfangio force-pushed the team/topher/chips-remove-120 branch 2 times, most recently from 1bc5658 to 44a73d2 Compare February 22, 2017 23:14

topherfangio added pr: needs review and removed in progress This issue is currently in progress labels Feb 22, 2017

willshowell mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2017

md-chips #120

Closed

devversion reviewed Feb 28, 2017

View reviewed changes

topherfangio mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2017

Add autocomplete example to chips documentation. #3273

Closed

topherfangio force-pushed the team/topher/chips-remove-120 branch from 44a73d2 to a0ecad2 Compare March 9, 2017 17:12

topherfangio force-pushed the team/topher/chips-remove-120 branch from a0ecad2 to 2a5819f Compare March 9, 2017 22:50

jelbourn reviewed Apr 11, 2017

View reviewed changes

willshowell mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2017

Theme color hue values for MdProgressSpinner, MdProgressBar are hardcoded #3935

Closed

kiwikern mentioned this pull request May 4, 2017

Replace select filter by autocompletion + chips kiwikern/Superfit-Schedule#1

Closed

tinayuangao mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2017

feat(chips): Add removal functionality/styling. #4912

Merged

willshowell mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2017

Are chips going to gain full functionality like tab to complete and x to close? #4913

Closed

jelbourn closed this Jun 2, 2017

angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 6, 2019

feat(chips): Add remove functionality/styling. #2476

feat(chips): Add remove functionality/styling. #2476

Conversation

topherfangio commented Dec 30, 2016 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

topherfangio commented Jan 4, 2017

jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

fxck commented Feb 15, 2017

topherfangio commented Feb 15, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

topherfangio commented Feb 22, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

JacobBrandt commented Mar 10, 2017

willshowell commented Mar 28, 2017

topherfangio commented Mar 28, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

axtho commented Apr 21, 2017

sabithpocker commented May 6, 2017

DmitryEfimenko commented Jun 1, 2017

jelbourn commented Jun 2, 2017

angular-automatic-lock-bot bot commented Sep 6, 2019

topherfangio commented Dec 30, 2016 •

edited