We are all excited by the progress made by many authors to make their papers reproducible by publishing associated code and data.
We know how challenging it can be so we want to showcase the value of the practice, both for original authors and as a learning experience for those who attempt to reproduce the work.
It’s imperative to note that ReproHacks are by no means an attempt to criticise or discredit work. We see reproduction as beneficial scientific activity in itself, with useful outcomes for authors and valuable learning experiences for the participants and the research community as a whole.
We invite nominations for papers that have both associated code and data publicly available. We also encourage analyses based on open source tools as we cannot guarantee participants will have access to specialised licenced software.
Current list of proposed papers and projects
Join us at the hack to dig into exciting science, learn more about reproducibility, working with other people’s code and data and more!
- Intro Slides Instructions and links
- Paper list List of submitted papers
- Hackpad Event collaborative notebook
- Feedback form Record feedback for authors
This is the master repo of the hack. We’ll collect information on the teams and projects, track discussions and collaborative notes on the event hackpad
As all ReproHack events, we strive to make this event open and inclusive to all. As such the event is governed by the ReproHack Code of Conduct and you should read it before participating. By participating, you are expected to uphold this code.
We encourage authors that are keen, to be available for participants to
reach out to for guidance or even just to say hello! You can do so by
joining the review-chat channel in our
slack group. We’ve
also set up an authors channel in our
slack group as a
place where you can also reach the organisers prior to the hack. You can
also start discussions or add comments through our collaborative
hackpad.
Introduction & Welcome slides
We’ll start with a brief review of the papers proposed and then form into teams. Feel free to work on your own if you prefer but we highly recommend you discuss your experiences with fellow participants as you work.
-
Add your details in the participants section of the hackpad so we have a complete list of participants.
-
In your teams decide which paper you wish to work on.
-
Register your team and paper by logging the title of the selected paper and the name(s) of the reviewer(s) in the hackpad. You can use the following template:
### **Paper:** <Title of the paper reproduced> **Reviewers:** Reviewer 1, Reviewer 2 etc.
Follow any instructions/documentation associated with the papers and try and reproduce the work. As you work through your paper, keep in mind the main points on which feedback to the authors will provided, Access, Reproducibility, Documentation and Reusability. It might help to have a look at the feedback form before you begin and keep notes during. Feel free to use the event hackpad to record general findings you wish to share with the group.
We’ll come together during the day to discuss progress and troubleshoot any sticking points.
Should you finish reproducing your paper quickly, feel free to explore the work more deeply. For example, you could try and run additional analyses, create new plots or even combine materials with your own or other open materials available on the web!
You might want to consider attempting to replicate the results, for example, if the code is in R consider translating the analysis to python and examining whether you are getting the same results. Such a contribution would be appropriate for publication in the ReScience C journal! Have a look at the journals website for further details.
Should you produce any additional materials relating to your reproduction during the session, we ask that you share it publicly and add any links to such materials to the hackpad.
Please complete the Reproducibility feedback form. Please also remember to be kind and constructive. Reproducibilty is hard and all authors submitting their papers have been incredibly brave. Here’s an example of feedback to authors.
You can use the hackpad to take notes and summarise your experiences.
Feel free to contribute any additional thoughts on our collaborative hackpad. These can help form the basis for a blogpost on the event.
This
work is licensed under a
Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
