DI - shielded token

[tzemanovic]

Describe your changes

Dependency injection for the shielded token - rm'ing cross-system dep on:

• parameters
• trans_token

The newly added test crates/systems/src/test.rs ensures that there are no cross-deps between these systems. More to be added as they are refactored.

Indicate on which release or other PRs this topic is based on

#3472

• diff: https://github.com/anoma/namada/pull/3466/files/105183ad984998c27efa8655d84e25aaed7a0b41..7f87875237a7c14549f2e1e38bd06517bca7196d

Checklist before merging to draft

• I have added a changelog
• Git history is in acceptable state

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 62.58566% with 819 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.38%. Comparing base (8479d38) to head (7f87875).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
crates/ibc/src/lib.rs	14.96%	324 Missing ⚠️
crates/shielded_token/src/vp.rs	0.00%	76 Missing ⚠️
crates/node/src/shell/testing/node.rs	0.00%	48 Missing ⚠️
crates/vm/src/wasm/run.rs	10.41%	43 Missing ⚠️
crates/node/src/bench_utils.rs	0.00%	39 Missing ⚠️
crates/apps_lib/src/client/rpc.rs	0.00%	36 Missing ⚠️
crates/node/src/dry_run_tx.rs	74.54%	28 Missing ⚠️
crates/node/src/protocol.rs	61.42%	27 Missing ⚠️
crates/apps_lib/src/client/tx.rs	0.00%	21 Missing ⚠️
crates/ibc/src/context/common.rs	81.81%	20 Missing ⚠️
... and 29 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3466      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.48%   54.38%   +0.89%     
==========================================
  Files         320      322       +2     
  Lines      110000   111555    +1555     
==========================================
+ Hits        58832    60667    +1835     
+ Misses      51168    50888     -280     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[grarco]

Looks good to me except for the compilation issue with wasm tests

[tzemanovic]

Looks good to me except for the compilation issue with wasm tests

ah, thx I missed this all the way back in the #3402 base