-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider publishing the individual files to npm #3
Comments
Thank you so much for opening this pressing issue. I'm sorry, but I am not certain about what you are referring to when you say "individual." Are you referring to the individual folder or a specific series of files? Also, if the latter, then which files? Again, I really appreciate it when someone takes the time to identify a bug, track it down, and open an Issue to shed light upon it. Thank you. |
Success (I think)! I have pushed up a new version of the library to integrate an ES6 module alternative to the library because it appears as though ES6 modules are easier for webpack to swallow (please don't quote me on this--I just learned webpack today, so I do not know much about webpack). Below is a download link for a "poor-man's" test used to validate whether or not the library is compatible with webpack. After opening the console on the demo.html page and refreshing, the number As I am still very new and inexperienced with ES6 modules and webpack, I would really appreciate your inspection and critique of my work in order to verify that everything has been done correctly with best-practices and so forth. Thank you so much for bringing this issue to my attention and explaining the problem so clearly and concisely. I really appreciate that you have spent your time to contribute to this project. ~ Happy coding! |
This would make tree-shaking in Webpack not include the same amalgamated file twice when used in ProvidePlugin.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: