Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

BSD License for module_utils should be 2 clause #133

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 9, 2020
Merged

BSD License for module_utils should be 2 clause #133

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
6a02431
BSD License for module_utils should be 2 clause
abadger Dec 9, 2020
d842ab1
Link to BSD-2-clause and GPLv3+
abadger Dec 9, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion collection_requirements.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ We should avoid FQCN / repository names:
Licensing
=========

At the moment, module_utils must be licensed under the BSD-3-clause or GPLv3+ license and all other content must be licensed under the GPLv3+. We will have a list of other open source licenses which are allowed as soon as we get Red Hat's legal team to approve such a list for us.
At the moment, module_utils must be licensed under the `BSD-2-clause <https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause>`_ or `GPL-3.0-or-later <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0-standalone.html>`_ license and all other content must be licensed under the `GPL-3.0-or-later <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0-standalone.html>`_. We will have a list of other open source licenses which are allowed as soon as we get Red Hat's legal team to approve such a list for us.


Repository management
Expand Down