Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ansible developer tools personas #147

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

oraNod
Copy link

@oraNod oraNod commented Apr 3, 2024

Adds persona definitions for Ansible developer tool documentation. The purpose of these personas is specifically intended to help identify the target audience for technical content, such as the docs.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Label error. Requires exactly 1 of: bug, enhancement, major, minor, patch, skip-changelog. Found:

@oraNod oraNod changed the title Ansible developer tools personas Ansible developer tools personas and journeys Apr 9, 2024
Co-authored-by: Aine Riordan <44700011+ariordan-redhat@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aine Riordan <44700011+ariordan-redhat@users.noreply.github.com>
@trishnaguha
Copy link
Member

trishnaguha commented May 14, 2024

@oraNod This needs to reviewed by @tima before this is published.

@tima
Copy link
Contributor

tima commented May 14, 2024

@oraNod How do these get resolved with the internal personas written up for dev tools in ANSTRAT-119?

@tima tima mentioned this pull request May 14, 2024
@oraNod
Copy link
Author

oraNod commented May 14, 2024

@oraNod How do these get resolved with the internal personas written up for dev tools in ANSTRAT-119?

@tima I wasn't aware of ANSTRAT-119. Looking through I think the personas we've defined here generally map to the ones in that issue.

Novice = Learner persona
IT automation engineer + Process automation engineer = Enterprise developer
Automation developer = ISV content creator
Operations engineer = CI/CD (more or less)

The point for the personas here is to help out with the documentation moreso than anything else. If these personas conflict with the ones in ANSTRAT-119 then maybe we should find another repo to store them in? Alternatively I guess we could rewrite the personas to match the ones in that issue but they sound much more strictly "enterprise".

@oraNod
Copy link
Author

oraNod commented May 15, 2024

Closing this PR after some discussion with @trishnaguha and @cidrblock Thanks everyone.

@oraNod oraNod closed this May 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants