-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 362
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate the alls-green
action into the main GHA CI workflow
#1639
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Almost there! Just drop the non-existing references…
GitHub does not provide us with this context, so it's not possible to retrieve. |
alls-green
action into the main GHA CI workflow
When rebuilding this work after repo cleanup, I missed removing these. Thanks for catching that. Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua>
Yeah, I was just highlighting the results of my testing and the limits of what this can provide, because the issue requesting doesn't really specify what information we were trying to get and I wanted it to be obvious what this does/doesn't do |
I'm honestly fine with the current approach. We already require the two docs build/checker jobs in the branch protection settings. |
But it requires somebody with proper access to continuously watch for the need to update the branch protection rules whenever workflows change, vs. having a transparent record of what's required. |
@oraNod can you add any appropriate backport labels (if we want this in anything other than devel for how)? |
Backport to stable-2.17: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #1647 🤖 @patchback |
* Integrating all-greens into ci.yml * removing non-existing references When rebuilding this work after repo cleanup, I missed removing these. Thanks for catching that. Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua> * Update .github/workflows/ci.yaml --------- Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua> Co-authored-by: Don Naro <dnaro@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit a732a1e)
@samccann Shoot. Guess I forgot the backport. Thanks for the reminder. Maybe we should just keep this on devel and stable-2.17. |
… (#1647) * Integrating all-greens into ci.yml * removing non-existing references When rebuilding this work after repo cleanup, I missed removing these. Thanks for catching that. Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua> * Update .github/workflows/ci.yaml --------- Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua> Co-authored-by: Don Naro <dnaro@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit a732a1e) Co-authored-by: Lyle McKarns <x1101@users.noreply.github.com>
Resolves #1284.
Testing shows that this doesn't surfaces which part of the nox matrix fails, but does fail the workflow when any of them do.