Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 5, 2024. It is now read-only.

Write "thou shalt not" guidelines for committers #3

Closed
gregdek opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

Write "thou shalt not" guidelines for committers #3

gregdek opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor

gregdek commented Feb 22, 2016

At the Ansible Contributor Summit, it became clear that we don't have good enough social guidelines for what core contributors "should" and "shouldn't" do. We need to write these guidelines, socialize them amongst the team, and get sign off, so that we can start adding more core contributors to ansible/ansible.

@mckerrj
Copy link

mckerrj commented Feb 23, 2016

Have you started a doc or anything on this? If not, I'd be happy to get some of it going or work with you on it. I'd like to get something posted in the next couple of days so we can kick this lose.

@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregdek commented Feb 23, 2016

mckerrj, jimi-c said you were on this, so I'm assigning to you.

@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregdek commented Feb 23, 2016

This should probably be a PR in ansible/ansible for the new "docs/proposals" directory or whatever we decide.

@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregdek commented Feb 23, 2016

In fact, rather than just say "hey whatever we decide," let's go ahead and create docs/proposals in ansible/ansible, with this as the first proposal.

@robynbergeron
Copy link
Contributor

Note: The title of this should probably be more specific to "committers" -- not contributors. Happy to edit the issue title to reflect :)

@gregdek gregdek changed the title Write "thou shalt not" guidelines for contributors Write "thou shalt not" guidelines for committers Feb 25, 2016
@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregdek commented Feb 25, 2016

Done.

@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregdek commented Feb 29, 2016

Robyn and I have both made comments. We should probably circle back to hammer out a final draft together this week if possible.

@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregdek commented Mar 1, 2016

Still undergoing internal review.

@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregdek commented Mar 4, 2016

Internal review complete; now waiting on @mckerrj to publish.

@gregdek
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregdek commented Mar 9, 2016

Thanks @mckerrj! This is now being debated in the PR itself.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants