Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix & Improvement to parametric heatsink function #4226

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

lorenzovecchietti
Copy link
Collaborator

@lorenzovecchietti lorenzovecchietti commented Feb 13, 2024

New function allows multiple parametric heatsink with any position and orientation, automatically placing it on top of a face. It is also possible to express dimensions relative to the base dimensions.

The new function also fixes a few bugs from the old one.

@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f47fce7) 81.99% compared to head (9b4b321) 81.99%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4226   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.99%   81.99%           
=======================================
  Files         183      183           
  Lines       64728    64725    -3     
=======================================
- Hits        53075    53073    -2     
+ Misses      11653    11652    -1     

@maxcapodi78
Copy link
Collaborator

New function allows multiple parametric heatsink with any position and orientation, automatically placing it on top of a face. It is also possible to express dimensions relative to the base dimensions.

The new function also fixes a few bugs from the old one.

Hi @lorenzovecchietti is it possible to derive deprecated method from the new one in order to reduce amount of code to tests and mantain?

@lorenzovecchietti lorenzovecchietti marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2024 16:19
pyaedt/icepak.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pyaedt/icepak.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pyaedt/icepak.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Kathy Pippert <84872299+PipKat@users.noreply.github.com>
@lorenzovecchietti lorenzovecchietti enabled auto-merge (squash) February 19, 2024 10:31
@lorenzovecchietti lorenzovecchietti merged commit 7337f6f into main Feb 23, 2024
15 checks passed
@lorenzovecchietti lorenzovecchietti deleted the Enhancement/parametricheatsink branch February 23, 2024 10:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants