Fixing not passing comp to the nodal_values function
#1997
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1997 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.98% 82.80% -0.18%
==========================================
Files 44 44
Lines 7932 7932
==========================================
- Hits 6582 6568 -14
- Misses 1350 1364 +14 |
|
@germa89 mapdl.post_processing.plot_nodal_values('b','x')On MAPDL 2023R1, PyMAPDL 0.64.1, Windows 10 Mike |
germa89
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2023
* Fixing not passing comp to the ``nodal_values`` function * Adding tests and fixing passing arguments * [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci --------- Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I dont really know how did I miss this.
@mikerife I believe this fix the main issue in #1974, however, can you give it a try? Does it simplify the example you gave in that issue?
Close #1974