Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 16, 2023. It is now read-only.

Compatibility with Django 1.8 #56

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2015

Conversation

aericson
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.34%) to 71.43% when pulling 7e53cb7 on aericson:django-18 into ef42a8f on antonagestam:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.34%) to 71.43% when pulling 3b7db94 on aericson:django-18 into ef42a8f on antonagestam:master.

@aericson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any ideas what could have caused the coveralls multiple comments? There was an update to the pull request after the first 6 comments, but that doesn't explain all those comments.

@antonagestam
Copy link
Owner

@aericson Yeah, I think tests are running on both TravisCI and CircleCI, sorry about that.

@aericson
Copy link
Contributor Author

No worries was just wondering since I changed the .travis.yml. Let me know if you need any changes to the PR

@antonagestam
Copy link
Owner

Absolutely, will take a closer look some day soon, but it looks good! 👍

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:22 PM, André Ericson notifications@github.com
wrote:

No worries was just wondering since I changed the .travis.yml. Let me know if you need any changes to the PR

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#56 (comment)

antonagestam added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2015
Compatibility with Django 1.8
@antonagestam antonagestam merged commit 8921f21 into antonagestam:master Apr 22, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants