[Chapter 3] Add use cases to Model

[walterkozlowski]

This relates to #156 about the need to add RL-1 (technology agnostic) reference model description including use cases that explain how the reference architectures should be operated upon from various actors perspective (VNF Developer, Cloud Service Provider, Cloud Service Consumer).

[BernardTsai-DT]

Would it be good to reshape the chapter 3 Abstraction in the following way:
3.1. Layer 0 Model
3.2. Layer 0 Resources
3.2. Layer 0 Management (incl. use-cases)

I had the impression that the model in RL-1 was more referring to the management aspects. But maybe I am mistaken here.

[walterkozlowski]

Yes, it is mostly about Management and Operations, I think. So we could do the way you propose.. The question is whether this is Layer 0 or rather Layer 1. That’s what probably we should discuss. From: BernardTsai-DT [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2019 8:02 PM To: cntt-n/CNTT <CNTT@noreply.github.com> Cc: Kozlowski, Walter <Walter.Kozlowski@team.telstra.com>; Author <author@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [cntt-n/CNTT] [Chapter 3] Add use cases to Model (#167) [External Email] This email was sent from outside the organisation – be cautious, particularly with links and attachments. Would it be good to reshape the chapter 3 Abstraction in the following way: 3.1. Layer 0 Model 3.2. Layer 0 Resources 3.2. Layer 0 Management (incl. use-cases) I had the impression that the model in RL-1 was more referring to the management aspects. But maybe I am mistaken here. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#167>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMONQF3NQFAB4TDAFEYHLUTQDFD2XANCNFSM4IJUNMTA>.

[pgoyal01]

Bernard, Agree with you and Walter. The content I provided can be labeled RL-1 VIM Model or NFVI Software Layer HL Components or NFVI Management and Operations. Best regards, Pankaj -------- pg683k@att.com | w 720.475.4530 | m 720.327.0104 From: walterkozlowski <notifications@github.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 4:09 AM To: cntt-n/CNTT <CNTT@noreply.github.com> Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [cntt-n/CNTT] [Chapter 3] Add use cases to Model (#167) Yes, it is mostly about Management and Operations, I think. So we could do the way you propose.. The question is whether this is Layer 0 or rather Layer 1. That’s what probably we should discuss. From: BernardTsai-DT [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2019 8:02 PM To: cntt-n/CNTT <CNTT@noreply.github.com<mailto:CNTT@noreply.github.com>> Cc: Kozlowski, Walter <Walter.Kozlowski@team.telstra.com<mailto:Walter.Kozlowski@team.telstra.com>>; Author <author@noreply.github.com<mailto:author@noreply.github.com>> Subject: Re: [cntt-n/CNTT] [Chapter 3] Add use cases to Model (#167) [External Email] This email was sent from outside the organisation – be cautious, particularly with links and attachments. Would it be good to reshape the chapter 3 Abstraction in the following way: 3.1. Layer 0 Model 3.2. Layer 0 Resources 3.2. Layer 0 Management (incl. use-cases) I had the impression that the model in RL-1 was more referring to the management aspects. But maybe I am mistaken here. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#167>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMONQF3NQFAB4TDAFEYHLUTQDFD2XANCNFSM4IJUNMTA><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_AMONQF3NQFAB4TDAFEYHLUTQDFD2XANCNFSM4IJUNMTA-253E&d=DwQFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=04D__BPkxmXV8JDzNnNJLA&m=OEa_9tf2qrL_IwH-dITZ29P7JMFrAGj9b1a3eqJoeqM&s=zRtC1HykG4VC3mtLz1K8mfpUGHsw9LfuhR0UQzLZ4gE&e=>. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_cntt-2Dn_CNTT_issues_167-3Femail-5Fsource-3Dnotifications-26email-5Ftoken-3DAMNRPAGDZXYLPC5U3C4JNGDQDFESJA5CNFSM4IJUNMTKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3UUR7Y-23issuecomment-2D518605055&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=04D__BPkxmXV8JDzNnNJLA&m=OEa_9tf2qrL_IwH-dITZ29P7JMFrAGj9b1a3eqJoeqM&s=qTEkb7bKC0klw4hFEo_-ga4UOp2ORMGrQzt_yYcH3rg&e=>, or mute the thread<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_AMNRPABBGDGEBET6SK2XDF3QDFESJANCNFSM4IJUNMTA&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=04D__BPkxmXV8JDzNnNJLA&m=OEa_9tf2qrL_IwH-dITZ29P7JMFrAGj9b1a3eqJoeqM&s=Tu0gd2XRD1on8aXPILkAbT34qdEim_ohAHonofdJ6dE&e=>.

[pgoyal01]

Closing #167 as addressed in Section 3.3