Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use latest jemalloc #1436

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Use latest jemalloc #1436

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ryoqun
Copy link
Member

@ryoqun ryoqun commented May 20, 2024

Problem

Summary of Changes

Fixes #

@ryoqun ryoqun marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 13:27
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.7%. Comparing base (da02962) to head (7c51158).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1436   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage    82.7%    82.7%           
=======================================
  Files         872      872           
  Lines      370361   370361           
=======================================
+ Hits       306528   306586   +58     
+ Misses      63833    63775   -58     

@ryoqun
Copy link
Member Author

ryoqun commented May 30, 2024

it looks like the latest jemalloc still exhibits this perf problem:

compared to the results in #1250 (comment), these following results are similar to the before of it:

# --block-verification-method blockstore-processor
ledger processed in 31 seconds, 809 ms, 61 µs
ledger processed in 31 seconds, 731 ms, 709 µs
ledger processed in 31 seconds, 898 ms, 749 µs

# --block-verification-method unified-scheduler
ledger processed in 16 seconds, 828 ms, 83 µs
ledger processed in 16 seconds, 780 ms, 69 µs
ledger processed in 17 seconds, 390 ms, 315 µs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants