Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARTEMIS-856 Test fixes #2209

Closed

Conversation

clebertsuconic
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@clebertsuconic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@michaelandrepearce I need you to take a look into this please.

MessageRedistributionFix is broken, up to the point I can't complete a whole testsuite on my internal CI.

My idea was the emulate the previous collection where redistributor would be an item, while still checking if redistributor is the only allowed item to be used on the loop.

I'm not sure how else we would change this without making substantial refactoring to your previous commit.

Can you look into this PR please?

@clebertsuconic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@michaelandrepearce : But please don't merge it yet.. I'm running a whole testsuite on the CI before we can merge this... just let me know what you think first.

@clebertsuconic
Copy link
Contributor Author

clebertsuconic commented Aug 2, 2018

<<<< I had written here, asking Michael to take a look on ExclusiveTest, but I later figured it out.. so I removed the comment here .. :) >>>>

@clebertsuconic clebertsuconic changed the title ARTEMIS-856 Fixing MessageRedistributionTest ARTEMIS-856 Test fixes Aug 2, 2018
@michaelandrepearce
Copy link
Contributor

michaelandrepearce commented Aug 2, 2018

@clebertsuconic, looks good, theres one bit of debug code youve left in that needs to be removed., there we some bits with consumer lists with the redistributor i heavily want to avoid, im working an alternative option, but if to fix master happy to merge this once the debug code is removed, and i can supply my alternative later (have raised a pr so you can see, but still not complete)

@@ -544,6 +560,7 @@ public boolean isExclusive() {

@Override
public synchronized void setExclusive(boolean exclusive) {
new Exception("exclusive set at " + exclusive).printStackTrace();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Think this needs to be removed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. That’s debug I forgot :p

@clebertsuconic
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is replaced by #2211

@clebertsuconic clebertsuconic deleted the redistribution-fix branch July 30, 2019 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants