Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mismatching dates in Run ID and Grid View #38977

Open
1 of 2 tasks
RNHTTR opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Mismatching dates in Run ID and Grid View #38977

RNHTTR opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
affected_version:2.9 area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. good first issue kind:bug This is a clearly a bug

Comments

@RNHTTR
Copy link
Collaborator

RNHTTR commented Apr 12, 2024

Apache Airflow version

2.9.0

If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

No response

What happened?

The fact that the date in the Run ID (I think logical_date?) and the date displayed in human readable form in the grid view are different is really confusing.

What you think should happen instead?

The date reflected in the UI should match the date in the default Run ID

How to reproduce

Run a DAG with the @hourly schedule.

Operating System

n/a

Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

No response

Deployment

Official Apache Airflow Helm Chart

Deployment details

No response

Anything else?

image

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@RNHTTR RNHTTR added kind:bug This is a clearly a bug area:core needs-triage label for new issues that we didn't triage yet labels Apr 12, 2024
@tirkarthi
Copy link
Contributor

This looks like a similar report to #35946

@bbovenzi bbovenzi added area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. and removed area:core needs-triage label for new issues that we didn't triage yet labels Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
affected_version:2.9 area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. good first issue kind:bug This is a clearly a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants