APEXMALHAR-2517 relocate com.datatorrent packages to org.apache.apex #662
Conversation
fd3967b
to
d44076a
Compare
d44076a
to
107c73f
Compare
This is long overdue. LGTM. |
107c73f
to
5ffda33
Compare
Please give some time to look into this as there are a number of changes |
@PramodSSImmaneni this PR is difficult to rebase but the changes are trivial (imports and checkstyle fixes). I would like to wrap it up in a day or two. |
I am -1 on this as users this will break binary compatibility with current users, and will require code changes. For current users it is not backward incompatibility. The approach suggested in #664 is not adequate as it will require existing apps to stick to older version of Malhar. This change should be taken up in a major upgrade. |
@amolhkekre I will call out the following WRT your veto on this PR:
|
Please resolve conflicts and update pom. |
Thomas,
The thread has been taken up on Apex user forums. I believe a decision to
update the major version was taken, under which backward compatibility need
not hold. So do proceed.
Thks,
Amol
E:amol@datatorrent.com | M: 510-449-2606 | Twitter: @*amolhkekre*
www.datatorrent.com
…On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Vlad Rozov ***@***.***> wrote:
Please resolve conflicts and update pom.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#662 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEQrMlTuMByogm1iMdB-AQBjsC_veAz_ks5s4awRgaJpZM4O2jS2>
.
|
34e83e3
to
bdd78d7
Compare
pom.xml
Outdated
@@ -139,7 +139,10 @@ | |||
<excludes> | |||
<exclude>@org.apache.hadoop.classification.InterfaceStability$Evolving</exclude> | |||
<exclude>@org.apache.hadoop.classification.InterfaceStability$Unstable</exclude> | |||
<exclude>com.datatorrent.contrib.parquet</exclude> | |||
<exclude>com.datatorrent.lib</exclude> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are those excludes required if the major version is changed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, they won't be needed. Should I make the version change in the same commit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My take - yes. Is there a reason not to?
@vrozov added version number change and also removed obsolete samples directory. Will squash these commits once approved. |
@@ -19,14 +19,14 @@ | |||
|
|||
package com.datatorrent.apps.copy; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be relocated to org.apache.malhar.apps.copy (possibly as part of a follow-up PR). If yes, can you file JIRA?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM +1. Please squash commits.
0fc49be
to
aac5c9b
Compare
test this please |
1 similar comment
test this please |
No description provided.