feat: update an redirect annotation for ingress resource

[AlinsRan]

Type of change:

• Bugfix
• New feature provided
• Improve performance
• Backport patches

What this PR does / why we need it:

Pre-submission checklist:

• Did you explain what problem does this PR solve? Or what new features have been added?
• Have you added corresponding test cases?
• Have you modified the corresponding document?
• Is this PR backward compatible? If it is not backward compatible, please discuss on the mailing list first

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #975 (c497376) into master (0f4391a) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #975      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   31.91%   31.90%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          73       73              
  Lines        7953     7955       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         2538     2538              
- Misses       5139     5141       +2     
  Partials      276      276              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/kube/translation/annotations/redirect.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0f4391a...c497376. Read the comment docs.

[jwrookie]

@AlinsRan Hi, some test error, pls have a check

[AlinsRan]

@AlinsRan Hi, some test error, pls have a check

This error is suite-plugins, but I only modified suite-annotations.
I again push?

[tokers]

IMHO since we want to make a permanent redirect, only codes 301 and 308 are allowed, in such a case, let users specify a custom HTTP status code that doesn't comply with the HTTP semantic.

[AlinsRan]

Do you mean to add test cases for other status codes?

[tokers]

I mean, we should only allow users configuring 301 or 308 here. If I configure a 302 code here, it doesn't comply the HTTP semantic, because 302 is a "temporarily" redirect, but what we want is "permanent".

[AlinsRan]

Got it.

[tao12345666333]

@tokers @AlinsRan According to RFC 7231 Status codes between 300 and 308 can indicate redirection.

Considering that we will also support temporary redirection, but adding a specific implementation for it alone is not of much value, here I suggest to merge it directly and modify this annotation to http-redirect and http-redirect-code , the corresponding verification logic is, if not configured, the default is http.StatusMovedPermanently, the allowed value is between http.StatusMultipleChoices and http.StatusPermanentRedirect.

[tao12345666333]

LGTM