Implement dyn scalar comparison kernels

[matthewmturner]

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Following the design set in #1074 we would like to add the remaining dynamic comparison kernels.

Scalar

• lt_dyn_scalar
• lt_eq_dyn_scalar
• gt_dyn_scalar
• gt_eq_dyn_scalar
• neq_dyn_scalar

UTF8 Scalar

• lt_dyn_utf8_scalar
• lt_eq_dyn_utf8_scalar
• gt_dyn_utf8_scalar
• gt_eq_dyn_utf8_scalar
• neq_dyn_utf8_scalar

Boolean

• lt_dyn_bool_scalar
• lt_eq_dyn_bool_scalar
• gt_dyn_bool_scalar
• gt_eq_dyn_bool_scalar
• neq_dyn_bool_scalar

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

[matthewmturner]

@alamb @liukun4515

I am submitting a bunch of the PRs now branching off my existing eq_dyn_scalar branch. The PRs now currently show all the changes because we havent merged that one in to master yet. Im hoping once that is merged i can simply rebase and these will be good to go.

[matthewmturner]

Going to stop here at the scalar kernels to make sure all good. If this approach is good ill do the utf8 and bool kernels

[liukun4515]

@alamb @liukun4515

I am submitting a bunch of the PRs now branching off my existing eq_dyn_scalar branch. The PRs now currently show all the changes because we havent merged that one in to master yet. Im hoping once that is merged i can simply rebase and these will be good to go.

@matthewmturner #1074 has been merged, you can rebase other prs, but I think we should merge the prs one by one and reduce the conflict. @alamb

[matthewmturner]

@alamb @liukun4515

I am submitting a bunch of the PRs now branching off my existing eq_dyn_scalar branch. The PRs now currently show all the changes because we havent merged that one in to master yet. Im hoping once that is merged i can simply rebase and these will be good to go.

@matthewmturner #1074 has been merged, you can rebase other prs, but I think we should merge the prs one by one and reduce the conflict. @alamb

Agree. I was expecting to do that