We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Observed on master branch
Error compiling Cython file: ------------------------------------------------------------ ... if hasattr(self, 'as_py'): return repr(self.as_py()) else: return super(Scalar, self).__repr__() def __eq__(self, other): ^ ------------------------------------------------------------ /home/wesm/code/arrow/python/pyarrow/scalar.pxi:67:4: Special method __eq__ must be implemented via __richcmp__ Error compiling Cython file: ------------------------------------------------------------ ... Return true if the tensors contains exactly equal data """ self._validate() return self.tp.Equals(deref(other.tp)) def __eq__(self, other): ^ ------------------------------------------------------------ /home/wesm/code/arrow/python/pyarrow/array.pxi:571:4: Special method __eq__ must be implemented via __richcmp__ Error compiling Cython file: ------------------------------------------------------------ ... cdef c_bool result = False with nogil: result = self.buffer.get().Equals(deref(other.buffer.get())) return result def __eq__(self, other): ^ ------------------------------------------------------------ /home/wesm/code/arrow/python/pyarrow/io.pxi:675:4: Special method __eq__ must be implemented via __richcmp__
Upgrading Cython made this go away. We should probably use __richcmp__ though
__richcmp__
Reporter: Wes McKinney / @wesm Assignee: Antoine Pitrou / @pitrou
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-2305. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Uwe Korn / @xhochy: Would raising tge minimal required cython version be ok for us?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Antoine Pitrou / @pitrou: I would be fine with raising the minimum Cython version.
Antoine Pitrou / @pitrou: Issue resolved by pull request 1863 #1863
pitrou
No branches or pull requests
Observed on master branch
Upgrading Cython made this go away. We should probably use
__richcmp__
thoughReporter: Wes McKinney / @wesm
Assignee: Antoine Pitrou / @pitrou
PRs and other links:
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-2305. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: