We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expanded scope to include documenting all types.
Previous description:
uint8, int16, uint16 -> int32
uint32 -> numeric
int64, uint64 -> ?
Reporter: Romain Francois / @romainfrancois Assignee: Neal Richardson / @nealrichardson
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-3446. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Wes McKinney / @wesm: Thoughts about this? cc [~hadley] @javierluraschi
[~hadley]
Sorry, something went wrong.
Javier Luraschi / @javierluraschi: Seems reasonable to me, in fact, I think this is already implemented as follows:
uint8, int16, uint16 -> int32 uint32 -> numeric int64, uint64 -> bit64
So we can wait on @romainfrancois to confirm but this one can probably be closed.
Wes McKinney / @wesm: Can we close the loop on this, possibly documenting the issue?
Neal Richardson / @nealrichardson: Issue resolved by pull request 7441 #7441
nealrichardson
No branches or pull requests
Expanded scope to include documenting all types.
Previous description:
uint8, int16, uint16 -> int32
uint32 -> numeric
int64, uint64 -> ?
Reporter: Romain Francois / @romainfrancois
Assignee: Neal Richardson / @nealrichardson
Related issues:
PRs and other links:
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-3446. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: