We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It's unclear why this isn't public to begin with. Perhaps at the time, Iterator wasn't considered public, but now we are using it in public headers.
arrow/cpp/src/arrow/record_batch.cc
Line 359 in 916417d
Reporter: Will Jones / @wjones127 Assignee: Will Jones / @wjones127
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-17310. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
David Li / @lidavidm: What's the purpose of exposing the class vs providing another overload of Make()? (For subclassing?)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Will Jones / @wjones127: Oh I think that's a good approach too; I'd be fine with that.
David Li / @lidavidm: Issue resolved by pull request 13798 #13798
wjones127
No branches or pull requests
It's unclear why this isn't public to begin with. Perhaps at the time, Iterator wasn't considered public, but now we are using it in public headers.
arrow/cpp/src/arrow/record_batch.cc
Line 359 in 916417d
Reporter: Will Jones / @wjones127
Assignee: Will Jones / @wjones127
PRs and other links:
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-17310. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: