Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Python] Binding for FixedShapeTensorType #34882

Closed
AlenkaF opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #34883
Closed

[Python] Binding for FixedShapeTensorType #34882

AlenkaF opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #34883

Comments

@AlenkaF
Copy link
Member

AlenkaF commented Apr 4, 2023

Describe the enhancement requested

As the C++ implementation is merged #8510, we should add bindings to the extension type in Python.

Component(s)

Python

@AlenkaF AlenkaF self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
jorisvandenbossche added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
### Rationale for this change
In the C++ the fixed shape tensor canonical extension type is implementated #8510 so we can add bindings to the extension type in Python.

### What changes are included in this PR?
Binding for fixed shape tensor canonical extension type.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #34882

Lead-authored-by: Alenka Frim <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the 12.0.0 milestone Apr 11, 2023
liujiacheng777 pushed a commit to LoongArch-Python/arrow that referenced this issue May 11, 2023
### Rationale for this change
In the C++ the fixed shape tensor canonical extension type is implementated apache#8510 so we can add bindings to the extension type in Python.

### What changes are included in this PR?
Binding for fixed shape tensor canonical extension type.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#34882

Lead-authored-by: Alenka Frim <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
ArgusLi pushed a commit to Bit-Quill/arrow that referenced this issue May 15, 2023
### Rationale for this change
In the C++ the fixed shape tensor canonical extension type is implementated apache#8510 so we can add bindings to the extension type in Python.

### What changes are included in this PR?
Binding for fixed shape tensor canonical extension type.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#34882

Lead-authored-by: Alenka Frim <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
rtpsw pushed a commit to rtpsw/arrow that referenced this issue May 16, 2023
### Rationale for this change
In the C++ the fixed shape tensor canonical extension type is implementated apache#8510 so we can add bindings to the extension type in Python.

### What changes are included in this PR?
Binding for fixed shape tensor canonical extension type.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#34882

Lead-authored-by: Alenka Frim <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants