[Go][FlightRPC] Add support for ordered data #35085
Comments
kou
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 9, 2023
…5178) ### Rationale for this change No ordering is unnecessarily limiting. Systems can and do implement distributed sorts, but they can’t reflect this in Flight RPC. ### What changes are included in this PR? These changes add `FlightInfo.ordered`. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. **This PR includes breaking changes to public APIs.** * Closes: #34852 * Closes: #35085 Lead-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com> Co-authored-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
liujiacheng777
pushed a commit
to LoongArch-Python/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2023
…ta (apache#35178) ### Rationale for this change No ordering is unnecessarily limiting. Systems can and do implement distributed sorts, but they can’t reflect this in Flight RPC. ### What changes are included in this PR? These changes add `FlightInfo.ordered`. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. **This PR includes breaking changes to public APIs.** * Closes: apache#34852 * Closes: apache#35085 Lead-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com> Co-authored-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
ArgusLi
pushed a commit
to Bit-Quill/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2023
…ta (apache#35178) ### Rationale for this change No ordering is unnecessarily limiting. Systems can and do implement distributed sorts, but they can’t reflect this in Flight RPC. ### What changes are included in this PR? These changes add `FlightInfo.ordered`. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. **This PR includes breaking changes to public APIs.** * Closes: apache#34852 * Closes: apache#35085 Lead-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com> Co-authored-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
rtpsw
pushed a commit
to rtpsw/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 16, 2023
…ta (apache#35178) ### Rationale for this change No ordering is unnecessarily limiting. Systems can and do implement distributed sorts, but they can’t reflect this in Flight RPC. ### What changes are included in this PR? These changes add `FlightInfo.ordered`. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. **This PR includes breaking changes to public APIs.** * Closes: apache#34852 * Closes: apache#35085 Lead-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com> Co-authored-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the enhancement requested
#34852 will include
.protochange, document update and C++ implementation.But we need one more implementation to making this "ordered data" proposal official.
See also: #35084
(Go is one of candidates. If anyone wants to work on this with other language, they are welcome.)
Component(s)
FlightRPC, Go
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: