-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Java] Reword warning about required --add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED
#38764
Comments
jsoref
added a commit
to jsoref/apache-arrow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
…ava.nio=ALL-UNNAMED` When someone encounters this message, it's precisely because they did *not* include `--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED`, but in order for arrow to work, they will need to add it.
jsoref
added a commit
to jsoref/apache-arrow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
…ava.nio=ALL-UNNAMED` When someone encounters this message, it's precisely because they did *not* include `--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED`, but in order for arrow to work, they will need to add it.
jsoref
added a commit
to jsoref/apache-arrow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2023
…ava.nio=ALL-UNNAMED` When someone encounters this message, it's precisely because they did *not* include `--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED`, but in order for arrow to work, they will need to add it.
--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED
--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED
lidavidm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2023
…o=ALL-UNNAMED` (#38765) ### Rationale for this change When someone encounters this message, it's precisely because they did *not* include `--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED`, but in order for arrow to work, they will need to add it. #38764 ### What changes are included in this PR? Changes `with` to `without` ### Are these changes tested? ### Are there any user-facing changes? The error message when arrow is run on a modern JVM will change from `with` to `without`: > java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to initialize MemoryUtil. Was Java started without `--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED`? (See https://arrow.apache.org/docs/java/install.html) * Closes: #38764 Authored-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
dgreiss
pushed a commit
to dgreiss/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Feb 19, 2024
…ava.nio=ALL-UNNAMED` (apache#38765) ### Rationale for this change When someone encounters this message, it's precisely because they did *not* include `--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED`, but in order for arrow to work, they will need to add it. apache#38764 ### What changes are included in this PR? Changes `with` to `without` ### Are these changes tested? ### Are there any user-facing changes? The error message when arrow is run on a modern JVM will change from `with` to `without`: > java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to initialize MemoryUtil. Was Java started without `--add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED`? (See https://arrow.apache.org/docs/java/install.html) * Closes: apache#38764 Authored-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.
We upgraded a java app's JRE to 21 and the java app apparently uses arrow, it reported this:
It should say
without
notwith
.Component(s)
Java
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: