Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MINOR: [Python] Deduplicate ensure_s3_initialized() call #38451

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2023

Conversation

pentschev
Copy link
Contributor

Rationale for this change

#38375 introduced duplicate calls to ensure_s3_initialized().

What changes are included in this PR?

Deduplicates call to ensure_s3_initialized().

Are these changes tested?

Yes, covered by existing S3 tests.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@pentschev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kou as per #38375 (comment), here's the PR to deduplicate the ensure_s3_initialized(). Thanks for catching that!

@kou
Copy link
Member

kou commented Oct 25, 2023

@github-actions crossbow submit -g python -g wheel

@github-actions
Copy link

Revision: 4023801

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-89f99927a7

Task Status
test-conda-python-3.10 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-cython2 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-2.9.2 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-3.2.1 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-pandas-latest Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-pandas-nightly Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-spark-v3.5.0 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-substrait Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.11 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-dask-latest Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-dask-upstream_devel Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-hypothesis Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-pandas-upstream_devel Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-spark-master Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.12 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.8 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.8-pandas-1.0 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.8-spark-v3.5.0 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.9 Github Actions
test-conda-python-3.9-pandas-latest Github Actions
test-cuda-python Github Actions
test-debian-11-python-3 Azure
test-fedora-35-python-3 Azure
test-ubuntu-20.04-python-3 Azure
test-ubuntu-22.04-python-3 Github Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp310-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp311-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp312-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp38-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp39-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-mojave-cp310-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-mojave-cp311-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-mojave-cp312-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-mojave-cp38-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-macos-mojave-cp39-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp310-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp310-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp311-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp311-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp312-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp312-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp38-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp38-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp39-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2-28-cp39-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp310-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp310-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp311-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp311-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp312-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp312-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp38-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp38-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp39-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-manylinux-2014-cp39-arm64 Github Actions
wheel-windows-cp310-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-windows-cp311-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-windows-cp312-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-windows-cp38-amd64 Github Actions
wheel-windows-cp39-amd64 Github Actions

@bdice
Copy link

bdice commented Oct 25, 2023

The failing Appveyor tests look similar to ones I just encountered. These may be solved by this PR to update the s3fs type_name strings used to determine which tests should be xfail'd, which changed with the recent release of s3fs 2023.10.0. #38455 I documented my findings here: conda-forge/arrow-cpp-feedstock#1211 (comment) and replied on the issue for PR #38455.

Copy link
Member

@kou kou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

We can ignore the AppVeyor failure in this PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Oct 25, 2023
@kou kou merged commit ff7b3bb into apache:main Oct 25, 2023
11 of 12 checks passed
@kou kou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Oct 25, 2023
@jakirkham
Copy link

Thanks all! 🙏

@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ff7b3bb.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 1 possible false positive for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
)

### Rationale for this change

apache#38375 introduced duplicate calls to `ensure_s3_initialized()`.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Deduplicates call to `ensure_s3_initialized()`.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes, covered by existing S3 tests.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

Authored-by: Peter Andreas Entschev <peter@entschev.com>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
dgreiss pushed a commit to dgreiss/arrow that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2024
)

### Rationale for this change

apache#38375 introduced duplicate calls to `ensure_s3_initialized()`.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Deduplicates call to `ensure_s3_initialized()`.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes, covered by existing S3 tests.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

Authored-by: Peter Andreas Entschev <peter@entschev.com>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants