Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-10535: [Rust] Implement bit & byte slice iterator for big endian platforms #8634

Conversation

vertexclique
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

vertexclique added a commit to vertexclique/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@nevi-me nevi-me left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
#[cfg(all(test, target_endian = "big"))]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

File needs license header @vertexclique

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it will come from here Neville https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8664/files#diff-715ddfbc534281523a73117d3bf4986d69d8a375dd320bc19f83298d3ba7ebd6R1

I will rebase this branch on top of that one, waiting for it to be merged.

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Jan 13, 2021

@vertexclique -- Given the imminent Arrow 3.0 release, I am trying to clean up older Rust PRs and see if the authors have plans to move them forward.

Do you plan on working on this PR in the near future? If not, should we close this PR until there is time to make progress? Thanks again for your contributions so far.

@vertexclique
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alamb Thanks for reaching out! I don't have time to work on these PRs. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants