Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-10876 [Rust] validate row value type in json reader #8895

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

houqp
Copy link
Member

@houqp houqp commented Dec 11, 2020

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #8895 (1620af2) into master (3deae8d) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 61.53%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8895   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.98%   52.99%           
=======================================
  Files         172      172           
  Lines       30750    30762   +12     
=======================================
+ Hits        16294    16303    +9     
- Misses      14456    14459    +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
rust/arrow/src/json/reader.rs 83.17% <61.53%> (-0.09%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a5a9859...1620af2. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@nevi-me nevi-me left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nevi-me nevi-me closed this in c4a65b4 Dec 12, 2020
@houqp houqp deleted the qp_validate_json branch December 12, 2020 22:05
GeorgeAp pushed a commit to sirensolutions/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2021
Closes apache#8895 from houqp/qp_validate_json

Authored-by: Qingping Hou <dave2008713@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Neville Dipale <nevilledips@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants