Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-11329: [Rust] Don't rerun build.rs on every file change #9277

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mbrubeck
Copy link
Contributor

This speeds up development by avoiding rebuilding the whole library
when any file in the package directory is touched.

This speeds up development by avoiding rebuilding the whole library
when any file in the package directory is touched.
@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao changed the title [Rust] Don't rerun build.rs on every file change ARROW-11329: [Rust] Don't rerun build.rs on every file change Jan 20, 2021
Copy link
Member

@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mbrubeck , super happy to have you here, and thank you for your contribution!!

I created a issue on JIRA and changed the title to match it, I hope that is ok.

@github-actions
Copy link

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #9277 (c636cf1) into master (6912869) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9277      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.68%   81.65%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         215      215              
  Lines       52561    52410     -151     
==========================================
- Hits        42935    42795     -140     
+ Misses       9626     9615      -11     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
rust/benchmarks/src/bin/tpch.rs 6.97% <0.00%> (-5.13%) ⬇️
rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/empty.rs 82.81% <0.00%> (-2.27%) ⬇️
rust/parquet/src/file/statistics.rs 93.80% <0.00%> (-1.24%) ⬇️
rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/repartition.rs 73.64% <0.00%> (-0.60%) ⬇️
rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/limit.rs 57.47% <0.00%> (-0.49%) ⬇️
rust/arrow/src/csv/writer.rs 78.82% <0.00%> (-0.46%) ⬇️
...tafusion/src/physical_plan/datetime_expressions.rs 92.60% <0.00%> (-0.44%) ⬇️
rust/datafusion/tests/custom_sources.rs 75.00% <0.00%> (-0.41%) ⬇️
rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/filter.rs 70.27% <0.00%> (-0.40%) ⬇️
rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/csv.rs 74.26% <0.00%> (-0.38%) ⬇️
... and 48 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6912869...c636cf1. Read the comment docs.

@apache apache deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jan 20, 2021
kszucs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2021
This speeds up development by avoiding rebuilding the whole library
when any file in the package directory is touched.

Closes #9277 from mbrubeck/build

Authored-by: Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@limpet.net>
Signed-off-by: Jorge C. Leitao <jorgecarleitao@gmail.com>
GeorgeAp pushed a commit to sirensolutions/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2021
This speeds up development by avoiding rebuilding the whole library
when any file in the package directory is touched.

Closes apache#9277 from mbrubeck/build

Authored-by: Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@limpet.net>
Signed-off-by: Jorge C. Leitao <jorgecarleitao@gmail.com>
michalursa pushed a commit to michalursa/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2021
This speeds up development by avoiding rebuilding the whole library
when any file in the package directory is touched.

Closes apache#9277 from mbrubeck/build

Authored-by: Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@limpet.net>
Signed-off-by: Jorge C. Leitao <jorgecarleitao@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants