Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BEAM-12919] Removed IBM Streams from runner matrix #15542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 21, 2021
Merged

[BEAM-12919] Removed IBM Streams from runner matrix #15542

merged 1 commit into from Sep 21, 2021

Conversation

pcoet
Copy link
Collaborator

@pcoet pcoet commented Sep 21, 2021

This removes IBM Streams from the capability matrix. I think we can just remove all references from the yaml data file, and nothing will break. Everything looks right on my localhost.

@TheNeuralBit
@melap


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Choose reviewer(s) and mention them in a comment (R: @username).
  • Format the pull request title like [BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles, where you replace BEAM-XXX with the appropriate JIRA issue, if applicable. This will automatically link the pull request to the issue.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

ValidatesRunner compliance status (on master branch)

Lang ULR Dataflow Flink Samza Spark Twister2
Go --- Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status ---
Java Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Python --- Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status Build Status ---
XLang Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status ---

Examples testing status on various runners

Lang ULR Dataflow Flink Samza Spark Twister2
Go --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Java --- Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
--- --- --- --- ---
Python --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
XLang --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Post-Commit SDK/Transform Integration Tests Status (on master branch)

Go Java Python
Build Status Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Build Status

Pre-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

--- Java Python Go Website Whitespace Typescript
Non-portable Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Portable --- Build Status Build Status --- --- ---

See .test-infra/jenkins/README for trigger phrase, status and link of all Jenkins jobs.

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

Copy link
Member

@TheNeuralBit TheNeuralBit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM technically:
image

I'm just wondering if we should clear this with IBM folks first. @pgerv12 it looks like you originally added IBM Streams to the capability matrix in 0d7a885. Are you ok with us removing it now since IBM Streams is deprecated?

@pgerv12
Copy link
Contributor

pgerv12 commented Sep 21, 2021

@TheNeuralBit Yes, I approve. Unfortunately the IBM Streams product is near end-of-life and the Streaming Analytics service is being deprecated (which offered our Beam runner).

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member

Ack, thanks for the quick response

@TheNeuralBit TheNeuralBit merged commit 805bbe8 into apache:master Sep 21, 2021
@pcoet pcoet deleted the rm-ibm-doc branch September 21, 2021 17:11
calvinleungyk pushed a commit to calvinleungyk/beam that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2021
dmitriikuzinepam pushed a commit to dmitriikuzinepam/beam that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants