-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unit tests for RunInference keyed/unkeyed Modelhandler and examples #21856
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
4 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
c624d24
to
b301aa0
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #21856 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.09% 74.07% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 698 698
Lines 92503 92524 +21
==========================================
- Hits 68544 68541 -3
- Misses 22704 22728 +24
Partials 1255 1255
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
R: @tvalentyn |
LGTM, happy to merge when tests pass. |
Unit tests
These are used to catch TypeError when wrong input is passed to RunInference.
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
R: @username
).addresses #123
), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>
instead.CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.