Remove normalization in Pytorch Image Segmentation example

[yeandy]

Fixes #22224. I mistakenly added a normalization operation during the preprocessing step. This has been removed. The actuals file has also been overwritten with the updated outputs.

This should also fix the issue filed here #22413 because of a premature update of the actuals file.

---

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Choose reviewer(s) and mention them in a comment (R: @username).
• Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
• Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
• If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

[yeandy]

Run Python 3.7 PostCommit

[yeandy]

Run Python 3.9 PostCommit

[yeandy]

remind me after tests pass

[github-actions]

Ok - I'll remind @yeandy after tests pass

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #22371 (4417cad) into master (b0b9c68) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #22371   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.17%   74.17%           
=======================================
  Files         706      706           
  Lines       93229    93228    -1     
=======================================
+ Hits        69152    69155    +3     
+ Misses      22809    22805    -4     
  Partials     1268     1268           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python	83.54% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...m/examples/inference/pytorch_image_segmentation.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...hon/apache_beam/runners/worker/bundle_processor.py	93.30% <0.00%> (-0.25%)	⬇️
...ks/python/apache_beam/runners/worker/sdk_worker.py	89.09% <0.00%> (+0.15%)	⬆️
...hon/apache_beam/runners/direct/test_stream_impl.py	94.02% <0.00%> (+0.74%)	⬆️
sdks/python/apache_beam/io/source_test_utils.py	89.40% <0.00%> (+1.38%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us.

[github-actions]

All checks have passed: @yeandy

[github-actions]

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @pabloem for label python.

Available commands:

• stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
• remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
• waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

[github-actions]

Reminder, please take a look at this pr: @pabloem

[yeandy]

R: @AnandInguva

[github-actions]

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control

[yeandy]

Run Python 3.7 PostCommit

[yeandy]

Run Python 3.9 PostCommit

[yeandy]

Run Python 3.7 PostCommit

[yeandy]

Run Python 3.9 PostCommit

[yeandy]

Failures are unrelate. Local gradle test passes.

[yeandy]

R: @TheNeuralBit

[TheNeuralBit]

LGTM, but I'd like to get a green run on PostCommits before merging

[AnandInguva]

One of the test(unrelated here) is fixed recently. Let's rerun the post commits again

[AnandInguva]

Run Python 3.7 PostCommit

[AnandInguva]

Run Python 3.9 PostCommit

[yeandy]

Run Python 3.7 PostCommit

[yeandy]

Run Python 3.9 PostCommit

[yeandy]

Tests pass @TheNeuralBit @tvalentyn

[TheNeuralBit]

Thanks @yeandy!