Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BEAM-2024] internal comments #3128

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[BEAM-2024] internal comments #3128

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

aaltay
Copy link
Member

@aaltay aaltay commented May 12, 2017

R: @robertwb
cc: @davorbonaci (comment only change, if we can pick to the release branch, it is ok if it is too late.)

Copy link
Contributor

@robertwb robertwb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
from apache_beam.utils.timestamp import MAX_TIMESTAMP
from apache_beam.utils.timestamp import MIN_TIMESTAMP

# AfterCount is experimental. No backwards compatibility guarantees.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be in the docstring of AfterCount as well?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@aaltay
Copy link
Member Author

aaltay commented May 12, 2017

PTAL

@aaltay
Copy link
Member Author

aaltay commented May 12, 2017

(Local run of the tests passed.)

@aaltay
Copy link
Member Author

aaltay commented May 12, 2017

(Merging.)

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 89289e4 May 12, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 70.196% when pulling f0d7f4a on aaltay:after into c2a3628 on apache:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 70.225% when pulling f0d7f4a on aaltay:after into c2a3628 on apache:master.

@aaltay aaltay deleted the after branch August 28, 2017 21:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants