Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BEAM-6959] add beam_PostCommit_Go_VR_Flink job #8606

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 1, 2019

Conversation

ibzib
Copy link
Contributor

@ibzib ibzib commented May 17, 2019

Note that I pretty much used "validates runner" and "integration" as consistently as I could within the existing naming scheme, but the distinction is pretty much meaningless as it's the same few tests anyway.

R: @lostluck

Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

Lang SDK Apex Dataflow Flink Gearpump Samza Spark
Go Build Status --- --- --- --- --- ---
Java Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status Build Status Build Status
Python Build Status
Build Status
--- Build Status
Build Status
Build Status --- --- ---

Pre-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

--- Java Python Go Website
Non-portable Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Portable --- Build Status --- ---

See .test-infra/jenkins/README for trigger phrase, status and link of all Jenkins jobs.

@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

Run Seed Job

Copy link
Contributor

@lostluck lostluck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The different between the "validates runner" and "validates that SDK X works on runner Y" is subtle for sure. The validates runner term is definitely a holdover from the legacy implementations, instead of being precise for portability.

@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

R: @angoenka

@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

Run Go Flink ValidatesRunner

@ibzib ibzib force-pushed the go-flink-subprocess branch 2 times, most recently from f68884a to 413cdfc Compare May 17, 2019 20:45
@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

Run Seed Job

@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

Run Go Flink ValidatesRunner

@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

Run Seed Job

@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

Run Go Flink ValidatesRunner

@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

Hooray, it worked! We even got a shiny badge

Copy link
Contributor

@angoenka angoenka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!
We can also update following get more of those fancy badges
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/README.md
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/jenkins/README.md

We can do that in a followup PR.

@lostluck
Copy link
Contributor

\o/ Woot!

@ibzib
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibzib commented May 17, 2019

We can also update following get more of those fancy badges

Done, although I'm not sure why these manually maintained lists are still around. Shouldn't the process be automated?

@@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ golang {
}

task flinkValidatesRunner {
dependsOn ":beam-sdks-go-test:build"
dependsOn ":beam-runners-flink_2.11-job-server:shadowJar"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does the SDK not work on 2.11, or is that version not yet portable? I'm concerned about running on an older version of flink

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAIK this isn't actually a downgrade, it's just a change in the way we identify Flink runner versions (apparently with Flink versions now instead of Beam) as of [1]. @angoenka can you confirm?

[1] 1e7ea0d#diff-985a464c6b477d468d4fa026191dedf5

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this is just a naming change to match flink version.

@lostluck
Copy link
Contributor

Probably! I agree. @jasonkuster might have ideas around Generating the test grid README's properly based on something more canonical. However, it certainly shouldn't block this from going in.

@lostluck
Copy link
Contributor

@angoenka Is there anything blocking this being merged that must be in this PR? I think there's the one question on the Flink runner versioning that should be answered, but that's it.

Copy link
Contributor

@angoenka angoenka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ibzib

@@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ golang {
}

task flinkValidatesRunner {
dependsOn ":beam-sdks-go-test:build"
dependsOn ":beam-runners-flink_2.11-job-server:shadowJar"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this is just a naming change to match flink version.

@angoenka angoenka merged commit ae60a72 into apache:master Jun 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants