Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kafka: better integration with quarkus kafka extension #2333

Closed
lburgazzoli opened this issue Mar 15, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

kafka: better integration with quarkus kafka extension #2333

lburgazzoli opened this issue Mar 15, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

See: quarkusio/quarkus#15631 (comment)

@jamesnetherton
Copy link
Contributor

@lburgazzoli please can you expand on this a bit?

Is the comment you refer to hinting that we should use the Map of Kafka properties produced by quarkus-kafka-client for configuring the Camel component?

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor Author

I admin I've opened this mainly as a note to myself but never had the time to explore what exactly the quarkus-kafka-client provides beside the Map of kafka properties.

So yes, a first step would be to leverage the Map produced by the extension to configure the kafka component which would also bring support for service binding out of the box.

Thinking a little bit more, I don't know if anything need to be changed on the camel-kafka component but in my mind the map retrieve from the Quarkus extension should be used to set-up the defaults but people should be able to override any of the provided configuration through i.e. endpoint options.

@jamesnetherton jamesnetherton self-assigned this Apr 13, 2021
jamesnetherton added a commit to jamesnetherton/camel-quarkus that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2021
jamesnetherton added a commit to jamesnetherton/camel-quarkus that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2021
@ppalaga ppalaga added this to the 2.0.0-M1 milestone Oct 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants