Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use azure-sdk-bom instead of individual azure artifact versions #2297

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 1, 2021
Merged

Use azure-sdk-bom instead of individual azure artifact versions #2297

merged 1 commit into from Mar 1, 2021

Conversation

ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor

@ppalaga ppalaga commented Mar 1, 2021

No description provided.

oscerd
oscerd approved these changes Mar 1, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@oscerd oscerd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure about the Camel side.

aldettinger
aldettinger approved these changes Mar 1, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@aldettinger aldettinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The failing test is highly likely unrelated.

@ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

ppalaga commented Mar 1, 2021

The failing test is highly likely unrelated.

Hm... I can reproduce the optaplanner test failure with these changes and I cannot reproduce it with master.

@ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

ppalaga commented Mar 1, 2021

It passed with these changes when trying the second time.

@ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

ppalaga commented Mar 1, 2021

OK, I see this older CI run where the same issue happened https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/runs/1963000106?check_suite_focus=true#step:9:1875 and it has been reported in the past #2205

@ppalaga ppalaga merged commit 2a66767 into apache:master Mar 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jamesnetherton jamesnetherton jamesnetherton approved these changes

@oscerd oscerd oscerd approved these changes

@aldettinger aldettinger aldettinger approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@ppalaga @jamesnetherton @oscerd @aldettinger