Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix #3548 to exclude geronimo-jta_1.1_spec in camel-activemq #3550

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 16, 2022
Merged

Fix #3548 to exclude geronimo-jta_1.1_spec in camel-activemq #3550

merged 1 commit into from Feb 16, 2022

Conversation

zhfeng
Copy link
Contributor

@zhfeng zhfeng commented Feb 14, 2022

No description provided.

ppalaga
ppalaga approved these changes Feb 15, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ppalaga ppalaga left a comment •
edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is good to merge, but we should make sure that we do not pull in any non-canonical JTA spec artifacts anywhere through banning them via enforcer plugin. See #3551

@zhfeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhfeng commented Feb 16, 2022

Thanks @ppalaga and I will work on #3551 as well.

@zhfeng zhfeng merged commit a7b0531 into apache:main Feb 16, 2022
jamesnetherton pushed a commit to jamesnetherton/camel-quarkus that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2022
@zhfeng @jamesnetherton
Fix apache#3548 to exclude geronimo-jta_1.1_spec in camel-activemq (a…
d8795ac 
…pache#3550)
jamesnetherton pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2022
@zhfeng @jamesnetherton
Fix #3548 to exclude geronimo-jta_1.1_spec in camel-activemq (#3550)
f4a8fd5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ppalaga ppalaga ppalaga approved these changes

@jamesnetherton jamesnetherton jamesnetherton approved these changes

@oscerd oscerd oscerd approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@zhfeng @ppalaga @jamesnetherton @oscerd