CAMEL-20822: Implement OpenAI Tool Capabilities natively in Camel

[Croway]

Description

Target

• I checked that the commit is targeting the correct branch (note that Camel 3 uses camel-3.x, whereas Camel 4 uses the main branch)

Tracking

• If this is a large change, bug fix, or code improvement, I checked there is a JIRA issue filed for the change (usually before you start working on it).

Apache Camel coding standards and style

• I checked that each commit in the pull request has a meaningful subject line and body.

• I have run mvn clean install -DskipTests locally and I have committed all auto-generated changes

[github-actions]

🌟 Thank you for your contribution to the Apache Camel project! 🌟

🤖 CI automation will test this PR automatically.

🐫 Apache Camel Committers, please review the following items:

• First-time contributors require MANUAL approval for the GitHub Actions to run

• You can use the command /component-test (camel-)component-name1 (camel-)component-name2.. to request a test from the test bot.

• You can label PRs using build-all, build-dependents, skip-tests and test-dependents to fine-tune the checks executed by this PR.

• Build and test logs are available in the Summary page. Only Apache Camel committers have access to the summary.

• ⚠️ Be careful when sharing logs. Review their contents before sharing them publicly.

[davsclaus]

For multiple parameters, then Camel has support for this with multiValue options. This may be a nicer approach as you can then just do

parameter.foo=123&parameter.bar=true
parameterType.foo=integer&parameterType.bar=boolean

The type could maybe also be defined in the value itself

parameter.foo=integer:123&parameter.bar=boolean:true

[orpiske]

I'm nitpicking a bit with the documentation.

Overall, it looks promising!

[Croway]

For multiple parameters, then Camel has support for this with multiValue options. This may be a nicer approach as you can then just do

parameter.foo=123&parameter.bar=true parameterType.foo=integer&parameterType.bar=boolean

The type could maybe also be defined in the value itself

parameter.foo=integer:123&parameter.bar=boolean:true

Oh nice, I'll add multiValued options, thanks!