CAMEL-10013: Implemented test validating syntax of endpoint

[bedlaj]

I have implemented test which validates syntax of endpoints:

1. Syntax starts with component name
2. All syntax parts are defined as @UriPath
3. All @UriPath marked as required are contained in syntax.

Now is this assertion wrapped in try-catch, so the problems are reported only to console.
I would like to confirm with you this approach and get some suggestions if there is some assertion missing. After that I can fix reported problems and remove try-catch to make this tests actually fail on invalid syntax.

Currently it reports following and all seems to be actual problems:

• Component chatscript. Syntax chatscript:host:port/botname. Part botname is not defined as UriPath
• Component google-bigquery. Syntax google-bigquery:projectId:datasetId:tableName. Part tableName is not defined as UriPath
• Component google-bigquery-sql. Syntax google-bigquery-sql:query. Required param projectId is not defined in syntax
• Component ipfs. Syntax ipfs:host:port/cmd. Part host is not defined as UriPath
• Component pg-replication-slot. Syntax pg-replication-slot:host:port/database/slot:plugin. Part plugin is not defined as UriPath
• Component soroush. Syntax soroush:action/authorizationToken. Part authorizationToken is not defined as UriPath
• Component wordpress. Syntax wordpress:operationDetail. Required param operation is not defined in syntax

[oscerd]

looks really good

[oscerd]

I think it's a good approach to use a try-catch for the moment.

[bedlaj]

I have just started working on fixes of reported scheme problems. Is it OK to push this as part of this PR, or is someone working on merge already?

[oscerd]

Go ahead on the PR branch please @bedlaj thanks

[bedlaj]

Done and squashed to one commit.

[oscerd]

I'm merging this one too.

[oscerd]

Merged on master. Thanks