Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CARBONDATA-1330] Not able to drop temporary table but if carbon session is not enabled it is success #1284

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Aug 22, 2017

[CARBONDATA-1330] Not able to drop temporary table but if carbon session is not enabled it is success
Module Name : ACL
Modification reason: Not able to drop temporary table but if carbon session is not enabled it is success

Test cases are added for all DDL scenarios.

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Failed with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/318/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Failed with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/320/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Success with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/324/

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Aug 30, 2017

retest this please

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Success with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/329/

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Aug 31, 2017

retest this please

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Success with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/341/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Success with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/345/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Failed with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/350/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Success with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/353/

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 1, 2017

retest this please

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

SDV Build Success with Spark 2.1, Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/359/

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 4, 2017

retest this please

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Success , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/497/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Success , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/500/

@kumarvishal09
Copy link
Contributor

retest this please

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Success , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/506/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Fail , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/520/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Success , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/524/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Fail , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/525/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Success , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/526/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Success , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/558/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/19/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

@PannerselvamVelmyl Please rebase the code

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Fail , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/1202/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/571/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://88.99.58.216:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder/3076/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/4320/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://88.99.58.216:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder/3998/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/5208/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/7144/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://88.99.58.216:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder/5920/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/71/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.3.1, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/8820/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/753/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/575/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2023/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2200/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10275/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://121.244.95.60:12545/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/96/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://121.244.95.60:12545/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.3/95/

@CarbonDataQA1
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.4.4, Please check CI http://121.244.95.60:12545/job/ApacheCarbon_PR_Builder_2.4.4/93/

@CarbonDataQA2
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants