Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CARBONDATA-2387]Primitive AVRO Datatype Checking #2214

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sounakr
Copy link
Contributor

@sounakr sounakr commented Apr 23, 2018

Test case added to check all the primitive datatype support of AVRO and its corresponding mapping with carbon datatypes.

Supported Primitive Datatype.
1. Boolean
2. Int
3. long
4. float -> To carbon Internally it is double.
5. double
6. String

 Not Supported
 1.NULL Datatype
 2.Bytes
  • Any interfaces changed?

  • Any backward compatibility impacted?

  • Document update required?

  • Testing done
    Please provide details on
    - Whether new unit test cases have been added or why no new tests are required?
    - How it is tested? Please attach test report.
    - Is it a performance related change? Please attach the performance test report.
    - Any additional information to help reviewers in testing this change.

  • For large changes, please consider breaking it into sub-tasks under an umbrella JIRA.

out.append(fieldValue.toString());
break;
case NULL:
out.append("");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In testcase it is saying NULL is not supported, but here it is ""?

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://88.99.58.216:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder/4160/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Fail , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/4485/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/5344/

@sounakr sounakr closed this May 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants