Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CARBONDATA- 2243] Added test case for database and location path #2394

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anubhav100
Copy link
Contributor

@anubhav100 anubhav100 commented Jun 21, 2018

Be sure to do all of the following checklist to help us incorporate
your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Any interfaces changed?

  • Any backward compatibility impacted?

  • Document update required?

  • Testing done
    Please provide details on
    - Whether new unit test cases have been added or why no new tests are required?
    - How it is tested? Please attach test report.
    - Is it a performance related change? Please attach the performance test report.
    - Any additional information to help reviewers in testing this change.

  • For large changes, please consider breaking it into sub-tasks under an umbrella JIRA.

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/6448/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://88.99.58.216:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder/5279/

@anubhav100 anubhav100 force-pushed the CARBONDATA-2243 branch 2 times, most recently from 522e1df to 236ec46 Compare June 22, 2018 08:03
@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/6470/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://88.99.58.216:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder/5301/

@ravipesala
Copy link
Contributor

SDV Build Fail , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/5393/

@SangeetaGulia
Copy link
Contributor

retest this please

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://88.99.58.216:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder/5353/

@jackylk
Copy link
Contributor

jackylk commented Jun 30, 2018

Do you find any issue by adding these test case?

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/7108/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://88.99.58.216:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder/5884/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/42/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.3.1, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/8791/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/724/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/546/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/1995/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2172/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10247/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://121.244.95.60:12545/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/71/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://121.244.95.60:12545/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.3/70/

@CarbonDataQA1
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.4.4, Please check CI http://121.244.95.60:12545/job/ApacheCarbon_PR_Builder_2.4.4/70/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants