Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOTFIX] Fix compile error after merging PR#3001 #3067

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

zzcclp
Copy link
Contributor

@zzcclp zzcclp commented Jan 11, 2019

Fix compile error after merging PR#3001

Be sure to do all of the following checklist to help us incorporate
your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Any interfaces changed?

  • Any backward compatibility impacted?

  • Document update required?

  • Testing done
    Please provide details on
    - Whether new unit test cases have been added or why no new tests are required?
    - How it is tested? Please attach test report.
    - Is it a performance related change? Please attach the performance test report.
    - Any additional information to help reviewers in testing this change.

  • For large changes, please consider breaking it into sub-tasks under an umbrella JIRA.

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2261/

Copy link
Contributor

@xubo245 xubo245 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why CI pass in PR3001?

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10519/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2480/

@zzcclp
Copy link
Contributor Author

zzcclp commented Jan 11, 2019

It seems that it does not include 'spark2/src/test/java/' when compile, I will check this.

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2273/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2492/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10531/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2276/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10535/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2496/

Fix compile error after merging PR#3001
@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2277/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2497/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10536/

@zzcclp
Copy link
Contributor Author

zzcclp commented Jan 12, 2019

@QiangCai @xubo245 please take a look.

@@ -194,6 +193,12 @@
<version>2.18</version>
<!-- Note config is repeated in scalatest config -->
<configuration>
<includes>
<include>**/Test*.java</include>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check Scala test.
Please check why the number of test case +2?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of scala test cases ran.
But there are some java test cases of sub-project running twice, I will check this.

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2285/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2505/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10544/

@xubo245
Copy link
Contributor

xubo245 commented Jan 14, 2019

retest this please

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2291/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2511/

@CarbonDataQA
Copy link

Build Success with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10550/

@xubo245
Copy link
Contributor

xubo245 commented Jan 15, 2019

Still +2

@zzcclp
Copy link
Contributor Author

zzcclp commented Jan 15, 2019

Yup, I am trying to resolve this issue. But one suggestion: We can resolve this import error first and then I will raise another PR to resolve issue of testing twice, because it related to other sub-project too. OK? @xubo245 , @chenliang613

@xubo245
Copy link
Contributor

xubo245 commented Jan 15, 2019

@zzcclp ok, scala test is ok?

@zzcclp
Copy link
Contributor Author

zzcclp commented Jan 15, 2019

I think it's ok for scala test cases, you can check again.

@xubo245
Copy link
Contributor

xubo245 commented Jan 15, 2019

LGTM

1 similar comment
@QiangCai
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@asfgit asfgit closed this in c2003b0 Jan 16, 2019
@xubo245
Copy link
Contributor

xubo245 commented Jan 16, 2019

Thanks for you contribution!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2019
Fix compile error after merging PR#3001

This closes #3067
qiuchenjian pushed a commit to qiuchenjian/carbondata that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2019
Fix compile error after merging PR#3001

This closes apache#3067
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants