Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9660 #2096
Closed
Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9660 #2096
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A root volume can be replaced by a different root volume without the VM it belongs to being expunged. From dev@: For example: Let’s say we have a system VM running on NFS primary storage. We then put this primary storage into maintenance mode, which creates the system VM (with the same name) on a different primary storage (we do not create a new row in the cloud.vm_instance table for this VM). While this VM works, the original root disk of the system VM remains on the original primary storage and is not destroyed by the code in StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean) in 4.10 because 4.10 (as shown above) only asks for non-root volumes to consider for deletion. In the 4.9 version of the code, the original root disk is cleaned up in StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean). The problem with 4.10 relying on a root disk always being deleted when the VM it belongs to is deleted is that in a situation like this that the system VM doesn’t get deleted at this point – it gets a new root disk that’s hosted by a different primary storage (so now it’s original root disk is stranded).
|
Hi @mike-tutkowski base branch should be master as RC3 will be created from master |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-711 |
|
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3 |
|
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
Closing this PR and opening one against master |
|
Trillian test result (tid-1082)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A root volume can be replaced by a different root volume without the VM it belongs to being expunged.
From dev@:
For example: Let’s say we have a system VM running on NFS primary storage. We then put this primary storage into maintenance mode, which creates the system VM (with the same name) on a different primary storage (we do not create a new row in the cloud.vm_instance table for this VM). While this VM works, the original root disk of the system VM remains on the original primary storage and is not destroyed by the code in StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean) in 4.10 because 4.10 (as shown above) only asks for non-root volumes to consider for deletion. In the 4.9 version of the code, the original root disk is cleaned up in StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean). The problem with 4.10 relying on a root disk always being deleted when the VM it belongs to is deleted is that in a situation like this that the system VM doesn’t get deleted at this point – it gets a new root disk that’s hosted by a different primary storage (so now it’s original root disk is stranded).