api: fix account deletion event description

[shwstppr]

Description

Fixes #3109

This change fixes wrong event description with incorrect user and account IDs on account deletion.
While deleting an account, existing code was using accountID to query User from cloud.user. This resulted in the wrong user and account details in the event description. This has been fixed by listing all users for the given account and then using the first user(this will be the user with lowest ID value and will correspond to default user for the account) for details.

As per #3483 (review), show only account details and nothing for user.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Events on account delete,

How Has This Been Tested?

UI, cmk, DB validation

[shwstppr]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-112

[shwstppr]

ping for review @rhtyd @anuragaw @borisstoyanov

[rohityadavcloud]

LGTM, please rectify the event description to (a) use UUIDs instead of internal DB integer ids, (b) write id as ID in the string, (c) write accountId as account ID (you may also provide the name), (d) consider rewriting the description to say that the account with name and ID is being removed.

[shwstppr]

LGTM, please rectify the event description to (a) use UUIDs instead of internal DB integer ids, (b) write id as ID in the string, (c) write accountId as account ID (you may also provide the name), (d) consider rewriting the desdeletcription to say that the account with name and ID is being removed.

@rhtyd is it better now?

[rohityadavcloud]

Good work @shwstppr thanks!
@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-115

[rohityadavcloud]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

Trillian test result (tid-147)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32014 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr3483-t147-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 72 look OK, 0 have error(s)
Only failed tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

[rohityadavcloud]

cc @anuragaw @borisstoyanov can you review this? Thanks.

[anuragaw]

LGTM from code. Haven't tested.