Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

utils: fix check for metalink url #7636

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 19, 2023

Conversation

shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes condition

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
@shwstppr shwstppr requested a review from nvazquez June 15, 2023 12:55
Copy link
Contributor

@nvazquez nvazquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #7636 (1e4222c) into 4.18 (03910c2) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.18    #7636   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     12.98%   12.99%           
- Complexity     8984     8991    +7     
=========================================
  Files          2716     2716           
  Lines        256329   256343   +14     
  Branches      39974    39981    +7     
=========================================
+ Hits          33275    33301   +26     
+ Misses       218892   218875   -17     
- Partials       4162     4167    +5     

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@rohityadavcloud rohityadavcloud added this to the 4.18.1.0 milestone Jun 15, 2023
@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6241

@shwstppr shwstppr changed the title utils: fix check for mrtalink url utils: fix check for metalink url Jun 16, 2023
@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-6758)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 49372 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr7636-t6758-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 107 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_01_migrate_VM_and_root_volume Error 81.76 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_migrate_VM_with_two_data_disks Error 56.40 test_vm_life_cycle.py

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

code looks good @shwstppr, but what does this fix?

@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor Author

code looks good @shwstppr, but what does this fix?

Code

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

code looks good @shwstppr, but what does this fix?

Code

haha, no issue no description. why is this?

@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor Author

code looks good @shwstppr, but what does this fix?

Code

haha, no issue no description. why is this?

To fix code. I guess most developers should get the fact that the condition that has been changed was originally incorrect.

@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging based on tests and 2xLGTM

@shwstppr shwstppr merged commit 658daef into apache:4.18 Jun 19, 2023
24 of 26 checks passed
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

code looks good @shwstppr, but what does this fix?

Code

haha, no issue no description. why is this?

To fix code. I guess most developers should get the fact that the condition that has been changed was originally incorrect.

Yes, they should but we are not all developers here and some might want to test this and want to know what behaviourt to look for.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants