updated install-non-oss with vmware v7.0 and v8.0

[oferchen]

Description

This PR...

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[weizhouapache]

thanks for the pr @oferchen
actually more packages are needed
see https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack-nonoss/blob/main/install-non-oss.sh

[oferchen]

thanks for the pr @oferchen actually more packages are needed see https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack-nonoss/blob/main/install-non-ossI also added vsphere and customer connect and Netapp and the two juniper sdks

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.32%. Comparing base (3a0c312) to head (b9dc3a4).

❗ Current head b9dc3a4 differs from pull request most recent head f0eb682

Please upload reports for the commit f0eb682 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #9205      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     15.42%   15.32%   -0.11%     
+ Complexity    11818    11654     -164     
============================================
  Files          5474     5452      -22     
  Lines        478602   476525    -2077     
  Branches      62097    60180    -1917     
============================================
- Hits          73823    73016     -807     
+ Misses       396649   395440    -1209     
+ Partials       8130     8069      -61     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.20% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
unittests	16.07% <ø> (-0.12%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rohityadavcloud]

cc @nvazquez @Pearl1594
@oferchen I think what @weizhouapache is more appropriate it’s because most of us or our CI automation don’t use this script anymore.

[oferchen]

cc @nvazquez @Pearl1594 @oferchen I think what @weizhouapache is more appropriate it’s because most of us or our CI automation don’t use this script anymore.

As long as it is included in the repository might as well be updated and functional, specifically because some of the functionality won't work without it.