Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ui: fix minor issue with webhook forms #9335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2024

Conversation

shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr commented Jul 4, 2024

Description

  • Fix width of Test webhook delivery form
  • Fix auto execution of test delivery in create webhook form

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Before:
Form width is too much
Screenshot from 2024-07-04 14-10-38

Form is not executing test webhook delivery automatically when one of the earlier used value is selected
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/assets/153340/a9fc0a83-1fad-434c-97a3-8034a3768519

After

Form width fixed
Screenshot from 2024-07-04 14-14-27

Form is now executing test webhook delivery automatically when one of the earlier used value is selected
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/assets/153340/1904a5cf-54de-463b-8763-562a435ce784

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

- Fix width of Test webhook delivery form
- Fix auto execution of test delivery in create webhook form

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor Author

shwstppr commented Jul 4, 2024

UI on QA may not work as it is not based on main and APIs from the backend won't be available but still...

@blueorangutan ui

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.51%. Comparing base (3a0c312) to head (eb547ba).
Report is 38 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #9335      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     15.42%   15.51%   +0.09%     
- Complexity    11818    11938     +120     
============================================
  Files          5474     5492      +18     
  Lines        478602   480617    +2015     
  Branches      62097    59689    -2408     
============================================
+ Hits          73823    74574     +751     
- Misses       396649   397790    +1141     
- Partials       8130     8253     +123     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.17% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
unittests 16.28% <ø> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/9335 (QA-JID-394)

@rohityadavcloud rohityadavcloud added this to the 4.19.1.0 milestone Jul 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti merged commit a35d79a into apache:main Jul 4, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland deleted the fix-ui-webhook branch July 4, 2024 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants