Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TEST] increase coverage of datasource service #15801

Merged

Conversation

abzymeinsjtu
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose of the pull request

increase coverage of datasource service

@abzymeinsjtu abzymeinsjtu force-pushed the feat_inc_coverage_of_datasource_service branch from c45be38 to fddfc39 Compare April 6, 2024 08:43
@abzymeinsjtu abzymeinsjtu force-pushed the feat_inc_coverage_of_datasource_service branch from fddfc39 to 132b7dc Compare April 6, 2024 08:43
@abzymeinsjtu abzymeinsjtu force-pushed the feat_inc_coverage_of_datasource_service branch from 132b7dc to 5fc7423 Compare April 6, 2024 09:58
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39.14%. Comparing base (3b1de41) to head (d6d1b21).

❗ Current head d6d1b21 differs from pull request most recent head 5fc7423. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5fc7423 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev   #15801      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     39.15%   39.14%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     4898     4888      -10     
============================================
  Files          1326     1326              
  Lines         45220    45217       -3     
  Branches       4819     4818       -1     
============================================
- Hits          17706    17698       -8     
- Misses        25632    25648      +16     
+ Partials       1882     1871      -11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 6, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
9 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@SbloodyS SbloodyS added improvement make more easy to user or prompt friendly test 3.3.0 labels Apr 7, 2024
@SbloodyS SbloodyS added this to the 3.3.0 milestone Apr 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@SbloodyS SbloodyS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@SbloodyS SbloodyS merged commit 200d23f into apache:dev Apr 7, 2024
60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.3.0 backend improvement make more easy to user or prompt friendly ready-to-merge test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants