Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FINERACT-1958-Rework-Down-Payment-Overlapping-Installment #3467

Conversation

ruchiD
Copy link
Contributor

@ruchiD ruchiD commented Sep 22, 2023

Description

Fix for overlapping installments for down payments.
Test fix.
Describe the changes made and why they were made.

Ignore if these details are present on the associated Apache Fineract JIRA ticket.

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Write the commit message as per https://github.com/apache/fineract/#pull-requests

  • Acknowledge that we will not review PRs that are not passing the build ("green") - it is your responsibility to get a proposed PR to pass the build, not primarily the project's maintainers.

  • Create/update unit or integration tests for verifying the changes made.

  • Follow coding conventions at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Coding+Conventions.

  • Add required Swagger annotation and update API documentation at fineract-provider/src/main/resources/static/legacy-docs/apiLive.htm with details of any API changes

  • Submission is not a "code dump". (Large changes can be made "in repository" via a branch. Ask on the developer mailing list for guidance, if required.)

FYI our guidelines for code reviews are at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Code+Review+Guide.

Copy link
Contributor

@adamsaghy adamsaghy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please kindly see my review!

@ruchiD ruchiD force-pushed the FINERACT-1958-Rework-Down-Payment-Overlapping-Installment branch from bab8840 to d8ae02c Compare September 25, 2023 14:51
Copy link
Contributor

@reluxa reluxa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is looking good to me.

minor comment1: in the tests I would have added assertions for the disbursements as well. It's a bit weird that we have gaps in the indexes

loanDetails.getRepaymentSchedule().getPeriods().get(....).getPeriod()

Minor comment 2: I think a helper method which asserts all the attributes of an installments in the testcase could improve the readability.

assertEquals(0.0, loanDetails.getRepaymentSchedule().getPeriods().get(4).getPenaltyChargesPaid());
assertEquals(true, loanDetails.getRepaymentSchedule().getPeriods().get(4).getComplete());

// third period [2023-04-03 to 2023-04-03] overlapping down payment installment
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just for double checking. We don't want to create two separate entries for the two downpayments happend on the same day, right?

@ruchiD ruchiD force-pushed the FINERACT-1958-Rework-Down-Payment-Overlapping-Installment branch from d8ae02c to b6d8389 Compare September 28, 2023 12:04
Copy link
Contributor

@adamsaghy adamsaghy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@adamsaghy adamsaghy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@adamsaghy adamsaghy merged commit 98b7c29 into apache:develop Sep 28, 2023
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants