-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FLINK-13595][connector/kafka][test] Close the KafkaAdminClient with ... #10724
Conversation
…a timeout. Print stacktrace if a long closure happens.
Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community Automated ChecksLast check on commit 8eaf5ae (Mon Dec 30 14:32:23 UTC 2019) Warnings:
Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. Review Progress
Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commandsThe @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, changes LGTM.
tryDelete(adminClient, topic); | ||
} catch (Exception e) { | ||
e.printStackTrace(); | ||
fail(String.format("Delete test topic : %s failed, %s", topic, e.getMessage())); | ||
} finally { | ||
adminClient.close(Duration.ofMillis(30000L)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is way too long. If our stance is that the shutdown is not relevant for correctness then let's set this to a low value (5 seconds max).
Also add a comment that we don't use a try-with-resources so that we can introduce a timeout.
@@ -201,4 +202,15 @@ protected NetworkFailuresProxy createProxy(String remoteHost, int remotePort) { | |||
networkFailuresProxies.add(proxy); | |||
return proxy; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
protected void maybePrintDanglingThreadStacktrace(String threadNameKeyword) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering about the benefit. What do we gain by knowing where the KafkaAdminClient
is blocking?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This helps to identify where exactly internal thread of KafkaAdminClient
blocks. So we can address the root cause of the long closure, though it may be in Kafka instead of Flink.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems unlikely to ever be something in Flink though? I wouldn't want people start chasing Kafka bugs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think our goal is to make our tests stable, regardless of whether the bug is in Kafka or not. Adding this log is not only for debugging Kafka.
A dangling thread may not necessarily indicate a bug in Kafka. We don't know yet. For example, the blocking could be caused by our test environment setting, e.g. forget to unblock the broker traffic in some case.
Even if it is a bug in Kafka, it is better to know what exactly the bug is so we know the consequence of it. For example, in this case a topic may not be deleted, which may have impact in other tests.
Checked and confirmed the travis failure of 163dc9a is caused by a known issue as tracked by FLINK-15247 and irrelative to changes here. |
…a timeout. Print stacktrace if a long closure happens.
What is the purpose of the change
Fix the test failure caused by long closing time of the the
KafkaAdminClient
.Brief change log
Use the
close(Duration)
method inKafkaAdminClient
with a timeout. It looks that this does not guarantee the timeout will be honored due to the bug inKafkaAdminClient
. Therefore we also print the stacktrace of the danglingKafkaAdminClient
thread in case this happens again.Verifying this change
This change is already covered by existing tests that delete Kafka topics.
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
@Public(Evolving)
: (no)Documentation